How social cues shape task coordination and communication

To design computer-supported collaborative work (CSCW) systems that effectively support remote collaboration, designers need a better understanding of how people collaborate face-to-face and the mechanisms that they use to coordinate their actions. While research in CSCW has studied how specific social cues might facilitate collaboration in specific tasks, such as the role of gestures in video instruction, less is known about how a range of communicative cues might facilitate activities across many collaborative settings. In this paper, we model the predictive relationships between facial, gestural, and vocal cues and collaborative outcomes in three different tasks, drawing conclusions on how each cue might contribute to these outcomes in a given task and how such relationships generalize across tasks. The resulting models provide a quantitative understanding of the relative importance of each type of social cue in predicting collaborative outcomes, as well as a more thorough understanding of how the role of each social cue changes across tasks. Additionally, our results provide confirmation and illumination of prior findings in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication research.

[1]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Modeling and Evaluating Narrative Gestures for Humanlike Robots , 2013, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[2]  Christian Heath,et al.  Collaborative Activity and Technological Design: Task Coordination in London Underground Control Rooms , 1991, ECSCW.

[3]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Turn it this way: grounding collaborative action with remote gestures , 2007, CHI.

[4]  M. Friend,et al.  Principles for the Practice of Collaboration in Schools , 1991 .

[5]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VII. Agent Theories Architectures and Languages , 2000 .

[6]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Engaging robots: easing complex human-robot teamwork using backchanneling , 2013, CSCW.

[7]  G. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Interpersonal Communication , 1985 .

[8]  M. F. Schober Spatial perspective-taking in conversation , 1993, Cognition.

[9]  Alice F. Stuhlmacher,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN NEGOTIATION OUTCOME: A META‐ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[10]  Darren Gergle,et al.  See what i'm saying?: using Dyadic Mobile Eye tracking to study collaborative reference , 2011, CSCW.

[11]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  The mystery of the missing referent: objects, procedures, and the problem of the instruction follower , 2006, CSCW '06.

[12]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  A Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation , 1997, ATAL.

[13]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[14]  B. N. Buswell,et al.  Gender differences in self-esteem: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Polly Gerber Zimmermann Negotiation in the workplace. , 2003, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[16]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Effects of task properties, partner actions, and message content on eye gaze patterns in a collaborative task , 2005, CHI.

[17]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Gestures Over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  G. Gonzales,et al.  Information Technologies , 2019, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[19]  Stéphane Chatty,et al.  Supporting air traffic control collaboration with a TableTop system , 2011, CSCW.

[20]  Polly Gerber Zimmermann,et al.  Negotiation in the workplace. , 2003, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[21]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  ClearBoard: a seamless medium for shared drawing and conversation with eye contact , 1992, CHI.

[22]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  R. Stolzenberg,et al.  Multiple Regression Analysis , 2004 .

[24]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[25]  A. Carnevale Workplace Basics: The Skills Employers Want. , 1988 .

[26]  A. Isen,et al.  The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation , 1986 .

[27]  Laurent Karsenty,et al.  Cooperative Work and Shared Visual Context: An Empirical Study of Comprehension Problems in Side-by-Side and Remote Help Dialogues , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Where do helpers look?: gaze targets during collaborative physical tasks , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  M. Fireman,et al.  MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF SOIL DATA , 1954 .

[30]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Theories and methods in mediated communication , 2003 .

[31]  Adam Somlai-Fischer,et al.  Prezi meeting: collaboration in a zoomable canvas based environment , 2011, CHI EA '11.

[32]  Wei Dong,et al.  One piece at a time: why video-based communication is better for negotiation and conflict resolution , 2012, CSCW.

[33]  Caroline C. Hayes,et al.  Supporting Virtual Collaboration in Spatial Design Tasks: Are Surrogate or Natural Gestures More Effective? , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[34]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display , 2007, CHI.

[35]  Hideaki Kuzuoka,et al.  GestureCam: a video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration , 1994, CSCW '94.

[36]  Anthony Ralston,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers , 1960 .

[37]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. , 2008 .

[38]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  IllumiShare: sharing any surface , 2012, CHI.

[39]  Janice Nadler Rapport in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution , 2004 .

[40]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence , 2002, CSCW '02.

[41]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Language Efficiency and Visual Technology , 2004 .

[42]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving , 2001 .

[43]  Bjørn Erik Munkvold,et al.  The wheel of collaboration tools: a typology for analysis within a holistic framework , 2006, CSCW '06.

[44]  M. Morris,et al.  Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. , 2000 .

[45]  Tanya Stivers,et al.  Research on Language & Social Interaction , 2011 .

[46]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work , 2000, CSCW '00.

[47]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Modeling the impact of shared visual information on collaborative reference , 2007, CHI.

[48]  F. Vitaro,et al.  Effects of Friends’ Characteristics on Children’s Social Cognitions , 2001 .

[49]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Visual Information as a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks , 2003, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[50]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  The Effects of 10 Communication Modes on the Behavior of Teams During Co-Operative Problem-Solving , 1974, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[51]  Matthew J. Grawitch,et al.  Promoting creativity in temporary problem-solving groups: The effects of positive mood and autonomy in problem definition on idea-generating performance. , 2003 .

[52]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[53]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[54]  Elisabetta Bevacqua,et al.  A Model of Attention and Interest Using Gaze Behavior , 2005, IVA.

[55]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Explaining effects of eye gaze on mediated group conversations:: amount or synchronization? , 2002, CSCW '02.

[56]  Steven M. Farmer,et al.  Effects of Task Language Demands and Task Complexity on Computer-Mediated Work Groups , 1994 .

[57]  Khalid Benali,et al.  A Negotiation Model for CSCW , 2000, CoopIS.