CHAPTER 2 – Auditory and Phonetic Coding of Speech*

[1]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Some Stages of Processing in Speech Perception , 1975 .

[2]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Terry Winograd,et al.  FRAME REPRESENTATIONS AND THE DECLARATIVE/PROCEDURAL CONTROVERSY , 1975 .

[4]  A further parallel between selective adaptation and response contrast , 1978 .

[5]  M E Schouten,et al.  The case against a speech mode of perception. , 1980, Acta psychologica.

[6]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  Feature analyzers for the phonetic dimensionstop vs. continuant , 1976 .

[9]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Sawusch.  Processing of place information in stop consonants , 1977 .

[11]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[12]  A. Parducci.  Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[13]  R L Diehl,et al.  Feature detectors for speech: a critical reappraisal. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  A. Ades,et al.  How phonetic is selective adaptation? Experiments on syllable position and vowel environment , 1974 .

[15]  C. L. Searle,et al.  Stop consonant discrimination based on human audition. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  S. Blumstein,et al.  A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: evidence from a cross-language study. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D. Pisoni.  Identification and discrimination of the relative onset time of two component tones: implications for voicing perception in stops. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[19]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Dichotic Interactions of Speech Sounds and Phonetic Feature Processing. , 1974, Brain and language.

[20]  J L Elman.  Perceptual origins of the phoneme boundary effect and selective adaptation to speech: a signal detection theory analysis. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D. Klatt.  Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.

[23]  J. G. Martin,et al.  Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects in vowel-stop consonant-bowel sequences. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Fant Cg.  Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. , 1962 .

[25]  A M Liberman,et al.  Some characteristics of perception in the speech mode. , 1970, Research publications - Association for Research in Nervous and Mental Disease.

[26]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Differences between spectral dependencies in auditory and phonetic temporal processing: Relevance to the perception of voicing in initial stops. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Liberman.  On Finding That Speech Is Special , 1982 .

[29]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[30]  L. W. Labaw.  Wave-Front Determination in a Unidirectional Supersonic Beam , 1945 .

[31]  A. Liberman,et al.  Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  N Weisstein,et al.  A new perceptual context-superiority effect: line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground. , 1982, Science.

[33]  D Kewley-Port,et al.  Time-varying features as correlates of place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R E Pastore,et al.  Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-lead times: an example of categorical perception. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  P. MacNeilage.  Motor control of serial ordering of speech. , 1970, Psychological review.

[36]  M Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  T D Carrell,et al.  Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult's and child's perception of place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. Diehl,et al.  A further parallel between selective adaptation and contrast. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments , 1976 .

[40]  R. Aslin,et al.  Infants' discrimination of full and partial cues to place of articulation in stop consonants , 1980 .

[41]  E. C. Schwab,et al.  The role of second formant transitions in the stop-semivowel distinction , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Two left-hemisphere mechanisms in speech perception , 1974 .

[43]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The role of the gross spectral shape as a perceptual cue to place articulation in initial stop consonants. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  J D Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification function for synthetic VOT stimuli. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[47]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Audiovisual presentation demonstrates that selective adaptation in speech perception is purely auditory , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Adaptation of place perception for stops: Effects of spectral match between adaptor and test series , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  R. Patterson.  Auditory filter shape. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  V. Mann,et al.  Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  J. Mullennix,et al.  When selective adaptation and contrast effects are distinct: a reply to Diehl, Kluender, and Parker. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  S. Öhman.  Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[53]  Richard E. Pastore,et al.  Common-Factor Model of Categorical Perception. , 1977 .

[54]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  R L Diehl,et al.  Contrast effects on stop consonant identification. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  Niels Davidsen-Nielsen.  Syllabification in English words with medial sp, st, sk , 1974 .

[58]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Auditory and phonetic processes in place perception for stops , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[61]  J. Sawusch.  Selective adaptation effects on end-point stimuli in a speech series , 1976 .

[62]  P. Kuhl.  Discrimination of speech by nonhuman animals: Basic auditory sensitivities conducive to the perception of speech‐sound categories , 1981 .

[63]  W. A. Ainsworth,et al.  Mechanisms of selective feature adaptation , 1977 .

[64]  Peter D. Eimas,et al.  Some properties of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[65]  J D Miller.  Auditory processing of the acoustic patterns of speech. , 1984, Archives of otolaryngology.

[66]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Adaptation of speech by nonspeech: evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors. , 1979 .

[67]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  W. Koenig,et al.  The Sound Spectrograph , 1946 .

[69]  B. Repp.  Phonetic trading relations and context effects : new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception , 1982 .

[70]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[71]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes: Evidence for context effects with speech and nonspeech signals , 1980 .

[72]  A. Parducci.  Chapter 5 – CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS: A RANGE–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS* , 1974 .

[73]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Category boundaries for linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions of the same stimuli , 1974 .

[74]  E Paulus,et al.  Automatic speech recognition using psychoacoustic models. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants , 1975, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  A. Liberman,et al.  The role of selected stimulus-variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[77]  Wayne A. Wickelgran.  Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. , 1969 .

[78]  Peter J. Bailey,et al.  Identification of sine‐wave analogues of CV syllables in speech and nonspeech modes , 1977 .

[79]  A. Liberman,et al.  The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. , 1954 .

[80]  Lawrence C. Sager,et al.  Perception of wholes and of their component parts: some configural superiority effects. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[81]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Selective adaptation of linguistic feature detectors , 1973 .

[82]  Vivien C. Tartter,et al.  The role of auditory feature detectors in the perception of speech , 1975 .

[83]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some Experiments on the Perception of Synthetic Speech Sounds , 1952 .

[84]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[85]  I. Whitfield,et al.  RESPONSES OF AUDITORY CORTICAL NEURONS TO STIMULI OF CHANGING FREQUENCY. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[86]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Peripheral and central processes in selective adaptation of place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[87]  K. Stevens.  The Potential Role of Property Detectors in the Perception of Consonants , 1975 .