A prospective randomized controlled study of VAX-D and TENS for the treatment of chronic low back pain

Abstract Low back pain is one of the most significant medical and socioeconomic problems in modern society. International guidelines call for evidence-based management for the pain and disability associated with musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to address the question of efficacy and appropriateness of vertebral axial decompression (VAX-D) therapy, a new technology that has been shown in clinical research to create negative intradiscal pressures, and has been shown to be effective in treating patients presenting with chronic low back pain (> 3 months duration) with associated leg pain. Successful outcome was defined as a 50% reduction in pain utilizing a 10 cm Visual Analog Pain Scale and an improvement in the level of functioning as measured by patient-nominated disability ratings. Patients were randomly assigned to VAX-D or to TENS which was used as a control treatment or placebo. The TENS treatment demonstrated a success rate of 0%, while VAX-D demonstrated a success rate of 68.4% (p < 0.001). A statistically significant reduction in pain and improvement in functional outcome was obtained in patients with chronic low back pain treated with VAX-D. [Neurol Res 2001; 23: 780-784]

[1]  H. Iwata,et al.  The Involvement of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Inflammation in Lumbar Disc Herniation , 1998, Spine.

[2]  E. Gose,et al.  Vertebral axial decompression therapy for pain associated with herniated or degenerated discs or facet syndrome: an outcome study. , 1998, Neurological research.

[3]  N. Bogduk.  Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum , 1997 .

[4]  M. von Korff,et al.  The Course of Back Pain in Primary Care , 1996, Spine.

[5]  L. Klenerman,et al.  The Prediction of Chronicity in Patients With an Acute Attack of Low Back Pain in a General Practice Setting , 1995, Spine.

[6]  W. Martin,et al.  Effects of vertebral axial decompression on intradiscal pressure. , 1994, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  K. Hirabayashi,et al.  Neutral proteinases in human intervertebral disc. Role in degeneration and probable origin. , 1993, Spine.

[8]  V. Wright,et al.  Sciatica and the intervertebral disc; an experimental study. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  M. Falconer,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON THE CAUSE AND MECHANISM OF SYMPTOM-PRODUCTION IN SCIATICA AND LOW-BACK PAIN , 1948, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  M. Von Korff.  Studying the natural history of back pain. , 1994, Spine.

[11]  藤田 享介.  Neutral proteinases in human intervertebral disc : role in degeneration and probable origin , 1994 .

[12]  S D Kuslich,et al.  The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. , 1991, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[13]  A. Schultz,et al.  Intervertebral disc pressures during traction. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[14]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumber discs , 1970 .

[15]  G. Elfström,et al.  Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. A study of common movements, maneuvers and exercises. , 1970, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[16]  C. Hirsch.  An Attempt to Diagnose the Level of a Disc Lesion Clinically by Disc Puncture , 1949 .

[17]  G. Wiberg,et al.  Back pain in relation to the nerve supply of the intervertebral disc. , 1949, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.