Rough Set Theory in analyzing the attributes of combination values for the insurance market

Based on Rough Set Theory, this research addresses the effect of attributes/features on the combination values of decisions that insurance companies make to satisfy customers’ needs. Attributes impact on combination values by yielding sets with fewer objects (such as one or two objects), which increases both the lower and upper approximations. It also increases the decision rules, and degrades the precision of decisions. Our approach redefines the value set of attributes through expert knowledge by reducing the independent data set and reclassifying it. This approach is based on an empirical study. The results demonstrate that the redefined combination values of attributes can contribute to the precision of decisions in insurance marketing. Following an empirical analysis, we use a hit test that incorporates 50 validated sample data into the decision rule so that the hit rate reaches 100%. The results of the empirical study indicate that the generated decision rules can cover all new data. Consequently, we believe that the effects of attributes on combination values can be fully applied in research into insurance marketing.

[1]  Chien-Chung Chan,et al.  A Rough Set Approach to Attribute Generalization in Data Mining , 1998, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Business failure prediction using rough sets , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Renpu Li,et al.  Mining classification rules using rough sets and neural networks , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Rob Law,et al.  Incorporating the rough sets theory into travel demand analysis , 2003 .

[5]  C ONG,et al.  Building credit scoring models using genetic programming , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  Rough classification , 1984, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[8]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Rough sets theory , 1999 .

[9]  W. Ziarko,et al.  Rough sets applied to materials data , 1996 .

[10]  T. Hennig-Thurau,et al.  The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model development , 1997 .

[11]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Frank Witlox,et al.  The application of rough sets analysis in activity-based modelling. Opportunities and constraints , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[14]  Masahiro Inuiguchi Generalizations of Rough Sets: From Crisp to Fuzzy Cases , 2004, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[15]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  Rough sets, decision algorithms and Bayes' theorem , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  Toward Rough Set Foundations. Mereological Approach , 2004, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[17]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A study of the effect of consumer trust on consumer expectations and satisfaction: the Korean experience , 2003, ICEC '03.

[18]  Mohamed Quafafou,et al.  alpha-RST: a generalization of rough set theory , 2000, Inf. Sci..

[19]  Yi-Chung Hu,et al.  Finding fuzzy classification rules using data mining techniques , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[20]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Feature extraction using rough set theory and genetic algorithms--an application for the simplification of product quality evaluation , 2002 .

[21]  Daniel Vanderpooten,et al.  Construction of rule-based assignment models , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  M. Beynon,et al.  Variable precision rough set theory and data discretisation: an application to corporate failure prediction , 2001 .

[23]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..