Factorial Analysis of the Correlation Between Competitive Strategy and Company’s Characteristics: The Case of Romanian Business Environment

The cutthroat market competition for gaining competitive advantage and, implicitly, extra profits often makes companies intervene in competition mechanisms by closing deals or initiating anticompetitive practices. In order to avoid falling under the incidence of competition law, companies should apply a competition strategy and a competition audit. Our paper sets as a general objective the analysis of how companies on the Romanian market know, understand, and apply the coordinates of a competition strategy. Specific objectives target the factorial analysis of the influencers of the business strategy of the considered companies. For the factorial analysis, we have performed nonparametric tests of the answers given by 425 managers of companies on the Romanian market to certain questions in the questionnaire, in order to assess the importance of specific factors (company size, experience in the market, etc.) on the tested aspects regarding the business and, respectively, competition strategy and the risk of getting involved in anticompetitive behaviors.

[1]  S. Ospina,et al.  Competition and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Firm-Level Data , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  J. Fariñas,et al.  Firm productivity and export markets: a non-parametric approach , 2002 .

[3]  John Kay,et al.  Foundations Of Corporate Success , 1995 .

[4]  J Wagner,et al.  Exports, foreign direct investments and productivity: are services firms different? , 2014, Microeconometric Studies of Firms' Imports and Exports.

[5]  Christian von Hirschhausen,et al.  From Transition to Competition Dynamic Efficiency Analysis of Polish Electricity Distribution Companies , 2008 .

[6]  Paul S. Appelbaum,et al.  Voluntariness of Consent to Research: A Conceptual Model , 2009, The Hastings Center report.

[7]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Competition in the third millennium Efficiency or effectiveness , 2002 .

[8]  Oliver Budzinski,et al.  Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey , 2008 .

[9]  Niels Westergaard-Nielsen,et al.  Personnel policy and profit , 2004 .

[10]  L. Sels,et al.  The concept employability: a complex mosaic , 2003 .

[11]  Xiaoyun Wang,et al.  New evidence in an old debate: Investigating the relationship between HR satisfaction and turnover , 2007 .

[12]  Margit Molnar,et al.  Measuring Competition in Slovenian Industries: Estimation of Mark-ups , 2010 .

[13]  Kristian Möller,et al.  How to influence the birth of new business fields — Network perspective , 2009 .

[14]  André van Stel,et al.  Start-up intensity, competition and regional economic development , 2011 .

[15]  Junichiro Ishida,et al.  When Market Competition Benefits Firms , 2008 .

[16]  Anne Martensen,et al.  Management practices driving sustained business success , 2009 .

[17]  Leonardo Felli,et al.  Competition and Trust: Evidence from German Car Manufacturers , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[18]  Jon Ivar Håvold,et al.  Impacts of store and chain images on the “quality–satisfaction–loyalty process” in petrol retailing , 2010 .

[19]  G. Philip,et al.  Technology, competencies, and competitiveness: The case for reconfigurable and flexible strategies , 1998 .

[20]  Carlo Scarpa,et al.  Do Competition and Ownership Matter? Evidence from Local Public Transport in Europe , 2010 .