Near Misses in the Breakthrough Discovery Process

Why do researchers on the verge of breakthrough sometimes miss the discovery? While extensive literatures have modeled the course of successful discovery and pinpointed factors associated with groundbreaking discoveries, I focus on understanding why near misses occur by interviewing scientists who were very close to discovering the ribonucleic acid RNA interference breakthrough in biology but ultimately missed out. I identify three mechanisms rooted in paradigmatic rigidity that led to the seminal discovery being missed several times: not noticing or recognizing anomalies, actively resisting solutions, and failing to make the link between communities. These findings shed light on the process of breakthrough by clarifying that a better understanding of the mechanism behind near misses is crucial to mitigating them, saving time, and, consequently, boosting productivity and impact. They also have implications for boosting creative breakthrough performance in academic institutions and science-based firms, as well as for designing organizational research environments and guiding innovation strategy.

[1]  R. Carthew Gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  Keyvan Vakili,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation , 2013 .

[3]  Karen Locke,et al.  Perspective - Making Doubt Generative: Rethinking the Role of Doubt in the Research Process , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[4]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences , 2009 .

[6]  Michaël Bikard,et al.  Peer-Based Knowledge Validation: A Hurdle to the Flow of Academic Science to Inventors , 2015 .

[7]  A. Fire,et al.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1998, Nature.

[8]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  D. Simonton,et al.  Age and Creative Productivity: Nonlinear Estimation of an Information-Processing Model , 1989, International journal of aging & human development.

[10]  J. Mol,et al.  Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[11]  Joshua Lederberg,et al.  Pandemic as a Natural Evolutionary Phenomenon , 1988 .

[12]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries , 2009 .

[13]  R. Weisberg Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. , 1998 .

[14]  V. Ambros,et al.  The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14 , 1993, Cell.

[15]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[16]  Barbara Czarniawska Writing Management: Organization Theory as a Literary Genre , 1999 .

[18]  N. Rosenberg Science, Invention and Economic Growth , 1974 .

[19]  B. Golden The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[20]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Technological innovation: Technological choices and the inevitability of errors , 1997 .

[21]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[22]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[23]  K. Kemphues,et al.  par-1, a gene required for establishing polarity in C. elegans embryos, encodes a putative Ser/Thr kinase that is asymmetrically distributed , 1995, Cell.

[24]  J. A. Berson,et al.  Discoveries missed, discoveries made: creativity, influence, and fame in chemistry , 1992 .

[25]  Robert W. Weisberg,et al.  Problem solving and creativity , 1988 .

[26]  G. Macino,et al.  Quelling: transient inactivation of gene expression in Neurospora crassa by transformation with homologous sequences , 1992, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  J. Zhang,et al.  frizzled regulates mirror-symmetric pattern formation in the Drosophila eye. , 1995, Development.

[28]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[29]  J. Ahringer,et al.  The Caenorhabditis elegans sex determining gene fem‐3 is regulated post‐transcriptionally. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[30]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[31]  J. R Hackman,et al.  The Perils of Positivity , 2009 .

[32]  C. Napoli,et al.  Introduction of a Chimeric Chalcone Synthase Gene into Petunia Results in Reversible Co-Suppression of Homologous Genes in trans. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[33]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[34]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[35]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[36]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[37]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[38]  R. Collins,et al.  The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change , 1998 .

[39]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation: The Double-Edged Sword of Recombination , 2015 .

[40]  CC Mello,et al.  Return to the RNAi world: rethinking gene expression and evolution , 2007, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[41]  R. Merton Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[42]  Juliet M. Corbin,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2008 .

[43]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[44]  D. Simonton Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[45]  T. Gieryn,et al.  Marginality and Innovation in Science , 1983 .

[46]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[47]  D. Campbell,et al.  Evolving Methods for Enhancing Validity@@@Methodology and Epistemology for Social Science: Selected Papers , 1990 .

[48]  David Obstfeld Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation , 2005 .

[49]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Organizing and Failures of Imagination , 2005 .

[50]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[51]  A. Fire,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Gene silencing by double-stranded RNA , 2007, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[52]  D. Baulcombe,et al.  A similarity between viral defense and gene silencing in plants. , 1997, Science.

[53]  H. Vaucheret,et al.  Transgenes are dispensable for the RNA degradation step of cosuppression. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.