Explorative statistical analysis of planar point processes in microscopy

Basic methods of explorative statistical analysis for stationary and isotropic planar point processes are briefly and informally reviewed. At the explorative level, planar point patterns may be characterized in terms of the intensity, the K‐function and the pair correlation function. These second‐order functions enable one to classify a given point process as completely random, clustering or repulsive. The repulsive behaviour may be quantified by an estimate of the hard‐core distance. In the exploratory approach, the statistics are essentially free from model assumptions. Second‐order spatial functions have been estimated to characterize genuine planar point processes in the macroscopic domain, for example in forestry, geography and epidemiology. For light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, two situations are distinguished, which may be summarized as the genuine planar case and the stereological case. In the genuine planar case, a direct interpretation of the results of spatial statistics is feasible. Here, monolayers in cell culture, intramembranous particles on freeze fracture specimens and amacrine cells of the retina are mentioned as examples. In the stereological case, point patterns are generated by sections through 3D structures. Here the observed point patterns may arise as the centres of sectional profiles of particles, or as centres of sectional profiles of spatial fibre processes. In both situations, exploratory spatial point process statistics allow a quantitative characterization of sectional images for the purposes of group comparisons and classification. Moreover, for spatial fibre processes it has recently been shown that the observed pair correlation function of the centres of the fibre profiles is an estimate of the reduced pair correlation function of the fibre process in 3D. Hence for fibre processes a stereological interpretation of point process statistics obtained from sections is an additional option.

[1]  B. Hambly Fractals, random shapes, and point fields , 1994 .

[2]  B. Ripley Statistical inference for spatial processes , 1990 .

[3]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[4]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Replicated Spatial Point Patterns in Clinical Neuroanatomy , 1991 .

[5]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Fractals, random shapes and point fields : methods of geometrical statistics , 1996 .

[6]  J. Symanzik Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[7]  Alan Boyde,et al.  Analysis of a three-dimensional point pattern with replication , 1993 .

[8]  D Stoyan,et al.  Second‐order stereology of spatial fibre systems , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  Katja Schladitz,et al.  Statistical analysis of intramembranous particles using freeze fracture specimens , 2003, Journal of microscopy.

[10]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Displaced amacrine cells in the retina of a rabbit: analysis of a bivariate spatial point pattern , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Torsten Mattfeldt,et al.  Estimation of the directional distribution of spatial fibre processes using stereology and confocal scanning laser microscopy , 1994 .

[12]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  A comparison between parametric and non-parametric approaches to the analysis of replicated spatial point patterns , 2000, Advances in Applied Probability.

[13]  T. Mattfeldt Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1996 .

[14]  Jürgen Symanzik,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns , 2005, Technometrics.