Nationwide implementation of personalized outcomes forecasts to support physical therapists in treating patients with intermittent claudication: Protocol for an interrupted time series study

Introduction Shared decision-making is the cornerstone of patient-centered care. However, evidence suggests that the application of shared decision-making in physical therapy practice is limited. To elicit shared decision-making and thereby potentially improve patient outcomes for patients with intermittent claudication, we developed a decision support system. This decision support system provides personalized outcomes forecasts that visualize the estimated walking distance of an individual patient. We hypothesize that personalized outcomes forecasts can support physical therapists in personalizing care to the needs and priorities of the individual patient to improve therapy outcomes. Research objectives The primary aim is to evaluate the impact of personalized outcomes forecasts for patients with intermittent claudication to optimize personalized treatment. Second, this study aims to evaluate the process of implementation. Methods This study uses a prospective interrupted time series (ITS) design. Participating physical therapists are divided into four clusters. Every month of the study period, a new cluster will be invited to begin using the decision support system. We aim to include data of 11,250 newly referred patients for physical therapy treatment. All therapists associated with a network of specialized therapists (Chronic CareNet) and patients treated by these therapists are eligible to participate. The decision support system, called the KomPas, makes use of personalized outcomes forecasts, which visualize the estimated outcome of supervised exercise therapy for an individual patient with intermittent claudication. Personalized outcomes forecasts are developed using a neighbors-based approach that selects patients similar to the index patient (a.k.a. neighbors) from a large database. Outcomes to evaluate impact of implementation are patients’ functional and maximal walking distance, quality of life and shared decision-making. Process evaluation will be measured in terms of utilization efficacy, including the outcomes dropout rate and reasons to (not) use the personalized outcomes forecasts. Data will be routinely collected through two online systems: the Chronic CareNet Quality system, and the website logs of the decision support system. Additionally, observations and semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a small subset of therapists. Ethics Formal medical ethical approval by the Medical Research Ethics Committees United ‘MEC-U’ was not required for this study under Dutch law (reference number 2020–6250).

[1]  J. Teijink,et al.  The Impact of Personalized Outcomes Forecasts on Clinical Reasoning of Physical Therapists in Intermittent Claudication: A Vignette Study. , 2022, Physical Therapy.

[2]  J. Teijink,et al.  Personalised Outcomes Forecasts of Supervised Exercise Therapy in Intermittent Claudication: An Application of Neighbours Based Prediction Methods with Routinely Collected Clinical Data. , 2022, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  J. Teijink,et al.  Using a Learning Health System to Improve Physical Therapy Care for Patients With Intermittent Claudication: Lessons Learned From the ClaudicatioNet Quality System , 2021, Physical therapy.

[4]  S. van Buuren,et al.  Reference chart for knee flexion following total knee arthroplasty: a novel tool for monitoring postoperative recovery , 2020, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[5]  M. Härter,et al.  Evaluation of a shared decision-making communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma: a mixed methods study using simulated patients , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[6]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Shared decision making should be an integral part of physiotherapy practice. , 2019, Physiotherapy.

[7]  C. Ramsay,et al.  Methodology and reporting characteristics of studies using interrupted time series design in healthcare , 2019, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[8]  Dave A. Thomas,et al.  Practice , 2019, IEEE Softw..

[9]  S. Kaplan,et al.  A Framework and Resources for Shared Decision Making: Opportunities for Improved Physical Therapy Outcomes , 2018, Physical therapy.

[10]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  C. West,et al.  Charter on Physician Well-being. , 2018, JAMA.

[12]  G. Elwyn,et al.  An evaluation of two interventions to enhance patient-physician communication using the observer OPTION5 measure of shared decision making. , 2017, Patient education and counseling.

[13]  J. Wesche,et al.  Validation of the Vascular quality of life questionnaire – 6 for clinical use in patients with lower limb peripheral arterial disease , 2017, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.

[14]  M. Pettersson,et al.  Assessment of Minimum Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit with the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire-6 when Evaluating Revascularisation Procedures in Peripheral Arterial Disease. , 2017, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[15]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Exercise prescription for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a qualitative exploration of decision making in physiotherapy practice. , 2016, Physiotherapy.

[16]  A. Gasparrini,et al.  Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial , 2016, International journal of epidemiology.

[17]  Marijn M. L. van den Houten,et al.  Minimally Important Difference of the Absolute and Functional Claudication Distance in Patients with Intermittent Claudication. , 2016, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[18]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences , 2015, Implementation Science.

[19]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[20]  Evangelos Kontopantelis,et al.  Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  Curve matching: A data-driven technique to improve individual prediction of childhood growth , 2014 .

[22]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Shared Decision Making and Motivational Interviewing: Achieving Patient-Centered Care Across the Spectrum of Health Care Problems , 2014, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[23]  J. Cleland,et al.  Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality? , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[24]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Using a 'talk' model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION 5 Item. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[25]  M. Deveugele,et al.  Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Physical Therapy: Observed Level of Involvement and Patient Preference , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[26]  Roser Bono,et al.  The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the robustness of linear mixed models , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[27]  R. Thomson,et al.  Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[28]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Modelling interrupted time series to evaluate prevention and control of infection in healthcare , 2012, Epidemiology and Infection.

[29]  Maria E Fernandez,et al.  How we design feasibility studies. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[30]  M. Prins,et al.  Functional claudication distance: a reliable and valid measurement to assess functional limitation in patients with intermittent claudication , 2009, BMC cardiovascular disorders.

[31]  A K Wagner,et al.  Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research , 2002, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[32]  I. Coyne.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[33]  J. Skinner,et al.  Progressive vs single-stage treadmill tests for evaluation of claudication. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[34]  Alok Bhargava,et al.  Serial Correlation and the Fixed Effects Model , 1982 .

[35]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, Physical Therapy.

[36]  L. Fleisher,et al.  2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  V. Aboyans,et al.  Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases , in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery ( ESVS ) – Web Addenda , 2017 .