Model to Enhance Site-Specific Estimation of Leaf Wetness Duration.

The ability of empirical models to enhance accuracy of site-specific estimates of leaf wetness duration (LWD) was assessed for 15 sites in Iowa, Nebraska, and Illinois during May to September of 1997, 1998, and 1999. Enhanced estimation of LWD was obtained by applying a 0.3-m height correction to SkyBit wind-speed estimates for input to the classification and regression tree/stepwise linear discriminant (CART/SLD) model (CART/SLD/Wind model), compared to either a proprietary model (SkyBit wetness) or to the CART/SLD model using wind speed estimates for a 10-m height. The CART/SLD/Wind model estimated LWD more accurately than the other models during dew-eligible (20:00 to 9:00) as well as dew-ineligible (10:00 to 19:00) periods, and for the period 20:00 to 9:00 regardless of rain events. Improvement of LWD estimation accuracy was ascribed to both the hierarchical structure of decision-making in the CART procedure and wind speed correction. Accuracy of the CART/SLD/Wind model identifying hours as wet or dry varied little among the 15 sites, suggesting that this model may be desirable for estimating LWD from site-specific data throughout the midwestern United States.

[1]  R. Stull,et al.  Meteorology for Scientists and Engineers , 1999 .

[2]  R. Shaw,et al.  The dependence of canopy layer turbulence on within-canopy thermal stratification. , 1992 .

[3]  R. H. Shaw,et al.  Horizontal and vertical distribution of air temperature in a vegetation canopy , 1992 .

[4]  Daniel S. Wilks,et al.  Threshold Relative Humidity Duration Forecasts for Plant Disease Prediction. , 1991 .

[5]  W. Schuh,et al.  Influence of assessment time and modeling approach on the relationship between temperature-leaf wetness periods and disease parameters of Septoria glycines on soybeans , 1993 .

[6]  Thomas M. Loughin,et al.  Development and Validation of an Empirical Model to Estimate the Duration of Dew Periods , 1994 .

[7]  D. R. Davis,et al.  A new approach to recording the wetting parameter by the use of electrical resistance sensors. , 1970 .

[8]  J. Rotem,et al.  Pseudomonas lachrymans inoculum on infected cucumber leaves subjected to dew- and rain-type wetting. , 1976 .

[9]  T. Gillespie,et al.  Modeling Leaf Wetness in Relation to Plant Disease Epidemiology , 1992 .

[10]  Suranjan Panigrahi,et al.  Artificial neural network models of wheat leaf wetness , 1997 .

[11]  T. Gillespie,et al.  Estimating dew duration. II. Utilizing standard weather station data , 1981 .

[12]  W. Schuh Influence of interrupted dew periods, relative humidity, and light on disease severity and latent infections caused by Cercospora kikuchii on soybean , 1993 .

[13]  W. Cheney,et al.  Numerical analysis: mathematics of scientific computing (2nd ed) , 1991 .

[14]  M. Gleason,et al.  Effects of Coating, Deployment Angle, and Compass Orientation on Performance of Electronic Wetness Sensors During Dew Periods. , 2000, Plant disease.

[15]  T. Gillespie,et al.  SENSING DURATION OF LEAF MOISTURE RETENTION USING ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE GRIDS , 1978 .

[16]  M. Gleason,et al.  Testing the Accuracy and Precision of Wetness Sensors in a Tomato Field and on Turfgrass , 1994 .

[17]  M. Gleason,et al.  Validation of a Commercial System for Remote Estimation of Wetness Duration. , 1997, Plant disease.