Information system selection for a supply chain based on current trends: the BRIGS approach

Information systems are very crucial in today’s organizations, and hence the selection of the right system has become a very critical decision. As time has progressed, with new issues affecting the supply chain and the performance metrics being continually rewritten, the responsibility of the information systems has increased manifold. Nowadays, information systems are expected to perform a number of functions such as information security, big data handling, green supply chain and risk management and thus the basic problem of system selection is now more complex. Also, adding to the complexity is the fact that these new issues are interdependent and most of the times influence other issues in a variety of direct or indirect ways. This study addresses this problem by proposing a new model for information system selection by incorporating the latest trends in the supply chain. It also proposes an integrated methodology, to solve such a problem where interdependence between criteria exists. The advantages of this methodology over other existing techniques are delinking the evaluation of interdependent criteria weights from performance evaluation, flexibility of inputs, ability to handle vagueness and uncertainty in judgements. The methodology is illustrated using a numerical example.

[1]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis , 2015 .

[2]  Kim Hua,et al.  Harvesting Big Data to Enhance Supply Chain Innovation Capabilities : An Analytic Infrastructure Based on Deduction Graph , 2016 .

[3]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[4]  Jean-Marc Petit,et al.  Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology , 2011 .

[5]  T. Comes,et al.  A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling ☆ , 2015 .

[6]  Christian A. Ullrich Introduction to Supply Chain Management , 2014 .

[7]  S. Fawcett,et al.  Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform Supply Chain Design and Management , 2013 .

[8]  Milind Kumar Sharma,et al.  An application of the integrated AHP-PGP model for performance measurement of supply chain management , 2009 .

[9]  Dimitrios Chatzoudes,et al.  Factors affecting ERP system implementation effectiveness , 2011, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[10]  S. Nassar,et al.  Supply Chain Information Security: Emerging Challenges in the Telecommunications Industry , 2016 .

[11]  Shinhong Kim,et al.  An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection , 2001 .

[12]  Ping Wang,et al.  Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations , 2010, MIS Q..

[13]  Harminder Singh,et al.  Information Security Compliance Behaviour of Supply Chain Stakeholders: Influences and Differences , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Supply Chain Manag..

[14]  W. B. Lee,et al.  An enterprise collaborative management system - a case study of supplier relationship management , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[15]  Vipul Jain,et al.  A study on the interactions between supply chain risk management criteria using fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2013 .

[16]  John Quigley,et al.  Exploring dependency based probabilistic supply chain risk measures for prioritising interdependent risks and strategies , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  C. Fuchs The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability , 2008 .

[18]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications , 2016 .

[19]  M.-N. Mokhtarian A note on "Developing global manager's competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method" , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Arun Kumar Sangaiah,et al.  An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE approach for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness with reference to GSD project outcome , 2015, Neural Computing and Applications.

[22]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection , 2005 .

[23]  Anand Teltumbde,et al.  A framework for evaluating ERP projects , 2000 .

[24]  Yuan Li,et al.  A model for selecting an ERP system based on linguistic information processing , 2007, Inf. Syst..

[25]  O. Tang,et al.  Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management , 2011 .

[26]  Amitava Dutta,et al.  Management's Role in Information Security in a Cyber Economy , 2002 .

[27]  Eli Schragenheim,et al.  ERP : Tools, Techniques, and Applications for Integrating the Supply Chain, Second Edition , 2003 .

[28]  S. Min,et al.  Inter-relationship among risk taking propensity, supply chain security practices, and supply chain disruption occurrence , 2016 .

[29]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  A comprehensive framework for selecting an ERP system , 2004 .

[30]  Ching-Jong Liao,et al.  Exploring decisive factors in green supply chain practices under uncertainty , 2015 .

[31]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  A DECISION MODEL FOR INTERDEPENDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT SELECTION , 1996 .

[33]  Vipul Jain,et al.  An integrated approach for machine tool selection using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis , 2012 .

[34]  Elie Ofek,et al.  Manufacturer Benefits from Information Integration with Retail Customers , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[35]  K. Tan,et al.  Information Sharing, Buyer-Supplier Relationships and Firm Performance: A Multi-Region Analysis , 2008 .

[36]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  Effect of information sharing in supply chains with flexibility , 2009 .

[37]  Chandrasekharan Rajendran,et al.  The value of information sharing in a multi-product, multi-level supply chain: Impact of product substitution, demand correlation, and partial information sharing , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Frank Wiengarten,et al.  Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration , 2016 .

[39]  Arun Kumar Sangaiah,et al.  A fuzzy DEMATEL approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy information for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness in GSD projects , 2015 .

[40]  Vladimir Gorodetsky,et al.  Transportation Logistics Services from Cloud , 2012, 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[41]  Tai-Yue Wang,et al.  Machine selection in flexible manufacturing cell: A fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making approach , 2000 .

[42]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Green projects: An information drives analysis of four cases , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz,et al.  Business‐to‐Business Online Purchasing: Suppliers' Impact on Buyers' Adoption and Usage Intent , 2001 .

[44]  Kevin Ashton,et al.  That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing , 1999 .

[45]  Mihalis Giannakis,et al.  A multi-agent based system with big data processing for enhanced supply chain agility , 2016, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[46]  Dursun Delen,et al.  An analytic approach to better understanding and management of coronary surgeries , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain , 2015 .

[48]  Volker Stix,et al.  Profile distance method - a multi-attribute decision making approach for information system investments , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Jorge Verissimo Pereira,et al.  The new supply chain's frontier: Information management , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[50]  Alireza Aliahmadi,et al.  Identifying the cause and effect factors of agile NPD process with fuzzy DEMATEL method: the case of Iranian companies , 2009, J. Intell. Manuf..

[51]  Jerry C. Wei,et al.  Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain , 2007 .

[52]  Zuo-Jun Max Shen,et al.  Centralization versus Decentralization: Risk Pooling, Risk Diversification, and Supply Chain Disruptions , 2015 .

[53]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[54]  Arun Kumar Sangaiah,et al.  A combined fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy TOPSIS approach for evaluating GSD project outcome factors , 2014, Neural Computing and Applications.

[55]  Ahmet Can Kutlu,et al.  Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[56]  Eric Deakins,et al.  Supply chain information sharing: challenges and risk mitigation strategies , 2016 .

[57]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community , 2010, MIS Q..

[58]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Green supply chain practices evaluation in the mining industry using a joint rough sets and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology , 2015 .

[59]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[60]  Ravi S. Behara,et al.  Optimal information security investment in a Healthcare Information Exchange: An economic analysis , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[61]  Dirk Pieter van Donk,et al.  The impact of the customer order decoupling point on type and level of supply chain integration , 2016 .

[62]  Robert Glenn Richey,et al.  A global exploration of Big Data in the supply chain , 2016 .