Distributed force probe bending model of critical dimension atomic force microscopy bias

Abstract. Critical dimension atomic force microscopy (CD-AFM) is a widely used reference metrology technique. To characterize modern semiconductor devices, small and flexible probes, often 15 to 20 nm in diameter, are used. Recent studies have reported uncontrolled and significant probe-to-probe bias variation during linewidth and sidewall angle measurements. To understand the source of these variations, tip-sample interactions between high aspect ratio features and small flexible probes, and their influence on measurement bias, should be carefully studied. Using theoretical and experimental procedures, one-dimensional (1-D) and two-dimensional (2-D) models of cylindrical probe bending relevant to carbon nanotube (CNT) AFM probes were developed and tested. An earlier 1-D bending model was refined, and a new 2-D distributed force (DF) model was developed. Contributions from several factors were considered, including: probe misalignment, CNT tip apex diameter variation, probe bending before snapping, and distributed van der Waals-London force. A method for extracting Hamaker probe-surface interaction energy from experimental probe-bending data was developed. Comparison of the new 2-D model with 1-D single point force (SPF) model revealed a difference of about 28% in probe bending. A simple linear relation between biases predicted by the 1-D SPF and 2-D DF models was found. The results suggest that probe bending can be on the order of several nanometers and can partially explain the observed CD-AFM probe-to-probe variation. New 2-D and three-dimensional CD-AFM data analysis software is needed to take full advantage of the new bias correction modeling capabilities.

[1]  H. Dai,et al.  Nanotubes as nanoprobes in scanning probe microscopy , 1996, Nature.

[2]  P. Avouris,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes , 2001 .

[3]  Masahiro Watanabe,et al.  A novel AFM method for sidewall measurement of high-aspect ratio patterns , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Charles N. Archie,et al.  Reconciling measurements in AFM reference metrology when using different probing techniques , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  E. Hernández,et al.  Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability and Heat Transport in Carbon Nanotubes , 2007 .

[6]  Harry Heinzelmann,et al.  Comparative study of lithium fluoride and graphite by atomic force microscopy (AFM) , 1870 .

[7]  Winfried Denk,et al.  Local electrical dissipation imaged by scanning force microscopy , 1991 .

[8]  B. C. Park,et al.  Application of carbon nanotube probes in a critical dimension atomic force microscope , 2007, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Growth of nanotubes for probe microscopy tips , 1999, Nature.

[10]  Harry Heinzelmann,et al.  Atomic force microscopy for the study of tribology and adhesion , 1989 .

[11]  Seiji Akita,et al.  Influence of stiffness of carbon-nanotube probes in atomic force microscopy , 2000 .

[12]  Wai-Yim Ching,et al.  Calculating van der {Waals-London} dispersion spectra and Hamaker coefficients of carbon nanotubes in water from ab initio optical properties , 2007 .

[13]  Luca Grella,et al.  Sub-50-nm isolated line and trench width artifacts for CD metrology , 2004, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Martha I. Sanchez,et al.  Carbon nanotube scanning probe for profiling of deep-ultraviolet and 193 nm photoresist patterns , 2002 .

[15]  Gregory A. Dahlen,et al.  Carbon nanotube AFM probes for microlithography process control , 2006, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[16]  P. Yang,et al.  Attractive‐mode atomic force microscopy with optical detection in an orthogonal cantilever/sample configuration , 1992 .

[17]  Benjamin Bunday,et al.  Sidewall slope sensitivity of critical dimension atomic force microscopy , 2012 .

[18]  Motoyuki Hirooka,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation of an independent multi-walled carbon nanotube probe by tomography with high-resolution transmission electron microscope. , 2011, Journal of electron microscopy.

[19]  Georg Papastavrou,et al.  Adhesion of colloidal particles on modified electrodes. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[20]  Ndubuisi G. Orji,et al.  Progress on implementation of a reference measurement system based on a critical-dimension atomic force microscope , 2007 .

[21]  Ndubuisi G. Orji,et al.  Towards Accurate Feature Shape Metrology | NIST , 2008 .

[22]  S. McLaughlin Intermolecular and Surface Forces.Jacob N. Israelachvili , 1993 .

[23]  Sumio Hosaka,et al.  New atomic force microscope method for critical dimension metrology , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[24]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  Carbon nanotubes as probes for atomic force microscopy , 2000 .

[25]  Seiji Akita,et al.  Influence of Force Acting on Side Face of Carbon Nanotube in Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .

[26]  H. Kumar Wickramasinghe,et al.  Method for imaging sidewalls by atomic force microscopy , 1994 .

[27]  Hiroshi Itoh,et al.  Atomic force microscope method for sidewall measurement through carbon nanotube probe deformation correction , 2012 .