Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention.

Visual attention is the collection of mechanisms by which relevant visual information is selected, and irrelevant visual information is ignored. Visual working memory is the mechanism by which relevant visual information is retained, and irrelevant information is suppressed. In addition to this overlap in definition, a strong overlap in brain areas active during attention and working memory tasks is found. The present paper reviews the behavioral evidence for and against the hypothesis that visual working memory and attention are best regarded as one and the same cognitive function, with the same capacity, the same control processes, and the same representational content. The data are best explained by a unified model in which multiple representations can be maintained, but only one receives the current focus of attention. Task circumstances then determine how successful this central representation can be prioritized over its mnemonic competitors.

[1]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dividing the mind: The necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  G. Mangun,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Attention , 2001 .

[6]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[8]  M. Farah,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a shared representational medium for mental images and percepts. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  David Soto,et al.  Seeing the content of the mind: enhanced awareness through working memory in patients with visual extinction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Working Memory , 2001 .

[11]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A Resource Account of Inhibition , 1995 .

[12]  M M Smyth,et al.  Interference in immediate spatial memory , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[13]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[14]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Competition in visual working memory for control of search , 2003 .

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Selective attention and cognitive control: dissociating attentional functions through different types of load , 1998 .

[17]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[18]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Edward Awh,et al.  The Role of Spatial Selective Attention in Working Memory for Locations: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  K. Oberauer.  Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[25]  W. A. Phillips.  On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[26]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[28]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Jonides,et al.  Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  G. Woodman,et al.  Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory , 2002 .

[32]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  N. Lavie,et al.  The role of working memory in attentional capture , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Rehearsal in Spatial Working Memory: Evidence From Neuroimaging , 1999 .

[35]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The guidance effect of working memory load on visual search , 2010 .

[37]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[40]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Searching through subsets: a test of the visual indexing hypothesis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[41]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[42]  H Pashler,et al.  Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury’s hypothesis , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  G. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Working memory can guide pop-out search , 2006, Vision Research.

[46]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[48]  R. Logie.  Visuo-spatial Working Memory , 1994 .

[49]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[50]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. , 1994 .

[51]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[53]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[56]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[57]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Remembering a Location Makes the Eyes Curve Away , 2005, Psychological science.

[58]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can you select at once , 2005 .

[59]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Imaging Expectations and Attentional Modulations in theHuman Brain , 2022 .

[60]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[61]  G. Micheletti.  The Prefrontal Cortex. Anatomy, Physiology and Neuropsychology of the Frontal Lobe, Fuster J.M.. Raven Press, New York (1989) , 1989 .

[62]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[63]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming , 2006 .

[64]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[65]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  John Duncan,et al.  The demonstration of capacity limitation , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  J. Jonides,et al.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Visual working memory matches do not always attract attention , 2010 .

[69]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[70]  M J Farah,et al.  Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[72]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.