A comparative analysis of the active and residual magnetization methods in the nondestructive testing of rails
暂无分享,去创建一个
The comparison of residual Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) with traditional MFL method was carried out as applied to rail nondestructive testing. The mechanisms for the residual magnetization of rails are considered. It is concluded that the traditional Magnetic Flux Leakage method is more effective as compared with one based on а rail remanence.
[1] E. S. Gorkunov. Different remanence states and their resistance to external effects. Discussing the “method of magnetic memory” , 2014, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing.
[2] A. G. Antipov,et al. Evaluation of transverse cracks detection depth in MFL rail NDT , 2014, Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing.