Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony

Many formal organizational structures arise as reflections of rationalized institutional rules. The elaboration of such rules in modern states and societies accounts in part for the expansion and increased complexity of formal organizational structures. Institutional rules function as myths which organizations incorporate, gaining legitimacy, resources, stability, and enhanced survival prospects. Organizations whose structures become isomorphic with the myths of the institutional environment-in contrast with those primarily structured by the demands of technical production and exchange-decrease internal coordination and control in order to maintain legitimacy. Structures are decoupled from each other and from ongoing activities. In place of coordination, inspection, and evaluation, a logic of confidence and good faith is employed.

[1]  H. Spencer The principles of sociology , 1880 .

[2]  G. PITT-RIVERS Human Ecology , 1936, Nature.

[3]  C. Mills Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive , 1940 .

[4]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Bureaucratic Structure and Personality , 1940 .

[5]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[6]  Philip Selznick TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[7]  T. Parsons SUGGESTIONS FOR A SOCIALOGICAL APPROCH TO THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1956 .

[8]  ADULT EDUCATION IN TRANSITION , 1957 .

[9]  H. Shepard,et al.  Men Who Manage , 1959 .

[10]  Raymond E. Callahan Education and the Cult of Efficiency , 1962 .

[11]  N. Mayer,et al.  From Evangelism to General Services: The Transformation of the YMCA , 1963 .

[12]  Harold L. Wilensky,et al.  The Professionalization of Everyone? , 1964, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  E. Trist,et al.  The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments , 1965 .

[14]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[15]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[16]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[17]  Shirley Terreberry The Evolution of Organizational Environments , 1968 .

[18]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .

[19]  P. Blau A FORMAL THEORY OF DIFFERENTIATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1970 .

[20]  C. Perrow Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View , 1970 .

[21]  Work in Traditional and Modern Society. , 1973 .

[22]  G. E. Swanson An organizational analysis of collectivities , 1971 .

[23]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  The System of Modern Societies , 1972 .

[24]  W. Siffin,et al.  Bureaucracy , 1971 .

[25]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Bureaucracy in Modern Society , 1971 .

[26]  Peter Mchugh,et al.  The Social Ascription of Motives , 1971 .

[27]  John H. Freeman Environment, Technology, and the Administrative Intensity of Manufacturing Organizations , 1973 .

[28]  D. Bell The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society , 1973 .

[29]  David B. Tyack The One Best System , 1974 .

[30]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Bases and Use of Power in Organizational Decision Making: The Case of a University. , 1974 .

[31]  R. Duncan Organizations and Their Environments. , 1974 .

[32]  John W. Meyer Notes on the Structure of Educational Organizations. Occasional Paper No. 3. , 1975 .

[33]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[34]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Organizational Control: Two Functions. , 1975 .

[35]  Paul M. Hirsch,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness and the Institutional Environment. , 1975 .

[36]  K. Weick Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[37]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .