The Influence of Temporal Phase Differences on Texture Segmentation

Scene segmentation and perceptual grouping are important operations in visual processing. Pattern elements constituting individual perceptual objects need to be segregated from those of other objects and the background and have to be bound together for further joint evaluation. Both textural (spatial) and temporal cues are exploited for this grouping operation. Thus, pattern elements might get bound that share certain textural features and/or appear in close spatial or temporal contiguity. However, results on the involvement of temporal cues in perceptual grouping are contradictory [Kiper et al. (1991). Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 17, 1209; Fahle (1993). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 254, 199-203]. We therefore reinvestigated the relative contributions of temporal and spatial cues and their interactions in a texture-segmentation paradigm. Our data show that the visual system can segregate figures solely on the basis of temporal cues if the temporal offset between figure and ground elements exceeds 10 msec. Moreover, segregation of figures defined by orientation differences among pattern elements is facilitated by additional temporal cues if these define the same figure. If temporal and textural cues define different figures, the two cues compete and only the more salient pattern is perceived. By contrast, the detection of a figure defined by orientation is not impaired by conflicting temporal cues if these do not define a figure themselves and do not exceed offset intervals of 100 msec. These results indicate the existence of a flexible binding mechanism that exploits both temporal and textural cues either alone or in combination if they serve perceptual grouping but can exclude either of the two cues if they are in conflict or do not define a figure. It is proposed that this flexibility is achieved by the implementation of two segmentation mechanisms which differ in their sensitivity for spatial and temporal cues and interact in a facultative way.

[1]  S W Keele,et al.  Tests of a temporal theory of attentional binding. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Temporal integration in the visual system: Influence of temporal dispersion on figure-ground discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  G M Long,et al.  Iconic memory: a review and critique of the study of short-term visual storage. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  M. Wertheimer.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[5]  F. Attneave,et al.  What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping , 1970 .

[6]  R. Haber.  The impending demise of the icon: A critique of the concept of iconic storage in visual information processing , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  H. Nothdurft.  Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Phantom contours: A new class of visual patterns that selectively activates the magnocellular pathway in man , 1991 .

[10]  J. Beck,et al.  Line segregation. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[11]  G M Long,et al.  The varieties of visual persistence: Comments on Yeomans and Irwin , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  C. Koch,et al.  Spatial displacement, but not temporal asynchrony, destroys figural binding , 1995, Vision Research.

[14]  W. Singer,et al.  Interhemispheric synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat visual cortex , 1991, Science.

[15]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[16]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  B. Julesz.  A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  M Fahle,et al.  Figure–ground discrimination from temporal information , 1993, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  W. Singer.  Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. , 1993, Annual review of physiology.

[20]  C. von der Malsburg,et al.  Am I Thinking Assemblies , 1986 .

[21]  J. Beck.  Perceptual Grouping Produced by Changes in Orientation and Shape , 1966, Science.

[22]  W. Singer,et al.  Squint Affects Synchronization of Oscillatory Responses in Cat Visual Cortex , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  J. Beck.  Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[24]  Figure-ground discrimination from temporal phase , 1993 .

[25]  W. A. Phillips.  On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[26]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Magno- and parvocellular processing streams support different segmentation mechanisms , 1995 .

[27]  J. Beck.  Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping , 1966 .