Subjective vs. objective intelligibility of sentences in listeners with hearing loss.

The relation between rated intelligibility and correct key word repetitions of sentences was examined in listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. Ten lists of 10 CID sentences were arranged in two randomly ordered groups. Listeners were asked to complete two tasks: (1) rate the intelligibility of 50 sentences on a scale of 0 to 100%, and (2) repeat each of the 50 sentences, which were scored as the number of key words repeated correctly. Sentences were presented at five signal-to-noise ratios. The start level for sentence presentation was established using the method of adjustment and the Revised Speech Intelligibility Rating passages. Correlations of rated intelligibility and correct repetition were 0.85 for listeners with normal hearing and 0.86 for listeners with hearing loss. This study confirms the earlier work of Speaks, Parker, Harris, and Kuhl (1972), and the findings demonstrate that listeners with hearing loss preserve the ability to rate the intelligibility of speech.

[1]  J. D. Hood,et al.  Observations upon the Loudness Recruitment Phenomenon, with Especial Reference to the Differential Diagnosis of Disorders of the Internal Ear and VIII Nerve , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[4]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  CX Problems Related to the Use of Speech in Clinical Audiometry , 1955, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[5]  A. Boothroyd.  Statistical theory of the speech discrimination score. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C Speaks,et al.  Intelligibility of connected discourse. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Ability of hearing-impaired listeners to understand connected discourse. , 1977 .

[8]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Robert C. Bilger,et al.  Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .

[10]  R M Cox,et al.  Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: application to hearing aid selection. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R M Cox,et al.  Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Comparison of three hearing aid fittings using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) Test. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[15]  S. C. Purdy,et al.  FIABILITE, SENSIBILITE ET VALIDITE DU JUGEMENT DE L'INTELLIGIBILITE DE LA PAROLE OBTENUES PAR ESTIMATION DE LA GRANDEUR, ESTIMATION CATEGORIELLE ET COMPARAISON PAR PAIRES CHEZ DES SUJETS AGES , 1992 .

[16]  R M Cox,et al.  Evaluation of the speech intelligibility rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  C V Pavlovic,et al.  Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[18]  T D Trine,et al.  A Revised Speech Intelligibility Rating (RSIR) Test: Listeners with Normal Hearing , 1994, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[19]  C M Rankovic,et al.  Estimating articulation scores. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.