Making sense of nectar scents: the effects of nectar secondary metabolites on floral visitors of Nicotiana attenuata.

Flowers produce a plethora of secondary metabolites but only nectar sugars, floral pigments and headspace volatiles have been examined in the context of pollinator behavior. We identify secondary metabolites in the headspace and nectar of glasshouse- and field-grown Nicotiana attenuata plants, infer within-flower origins by analyzing six flower parts, and compare the attractiveness of 16 constituents in standardized choice tests with two guilds of natural pollinators (Manducasexta moths and Archilochus alexandri and Selasphorus rufus hummingbirds) and one nectar thief (Solenopsis xyloni ants) to determine whether nectar metabolites can 'filter' flower visitors: only two could. Moths responded more strongly than did hummingbirds to headspace presentation of nicotine and benzylacetone, the most abundant repellent and attractant compounds, respectively. For both pollinators, nectar repellents decreased nectaring time and nectar volume removed, but increased visitation number, particularly for hummingbirds. Fewer ants visited if the nectar contained repellents. To determine whether nicotine reduced nectar removal rates in nature, we planted transformed, nicotine-silenced plants into native populations in Utah over 2 years. Plants completely lacking nicotine in their nectar had 68-70% more nectar removed per night by the native community of floral visitors than did wild-type plants. We hypothesize that nectar repellents optimize the number of flower visitors per volume of nectar produced, allowing plants to keep their nectar volumes small.

[1]  D. Wood,et al.  Antimicrobial terpenes from oleoresin of ponderosa pine treePinus ponderosa: A defense mechanism against microbial invasion , 1992, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[2]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  ECOLOGICAL COSTS AND BENEFITS OF DEFENSES IN NECTAR , 2005 .

[3]  W. Boland,et al.  Postsecretory Hydrolysis of Nectar Sucrose and Specialization in Ant/Plant Mutualism , 2005, Science.

[4]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Fitness consequences of food-for-protection strategies in plants , 2005 .

[5]  I. Izhaki,et al.  Limited ability of Palestine Sunbirds Nectarinia osea to cope with pyridine alkaloids in nectar of Tree Tobacco Nicotiana glauca , 2004 .

[6]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Nicotine's Defensive Function in Nature , 2004, PLoS biology.

[7]  L. Galloway,et al.  Effects of low-efficiency pollinators on plant fitness and floral trait evolution in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae) , 2004, Oecologia.

[8]  R. Raguso.  WHY ARE SOME FLORAL NECTARS SCENTED , 2004 .

[9]  Judith L. Bronstein,et al.  ATTRACTING ANTAGONISTS: DOES FLORAL NECTAR INCREASE LEAF HERBIVORY? , 2004 .

[10]  J. Hildebrand,et al.  Electroantennographic and Behavioral Responses of the Sphinx Moth Manduca sexta to Host Plant Headspace Volatiles , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[11]  N. Hayashi,et al.  Floral Scent of Osmanthus fragrans Discourages Foraging Behavior of Cabbage Butterfly, Pieris rapae , 2000, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[12]  N. Hayashi,et al.  Identification of Floral Volatiles From Ligustrum japonicum that Stimulate Flower-Visiting by Cabbage Butterfly, Pieris rapae , 1998, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[13]  F. Marion-Poll,et al.  Floral volatiles ofTanacetum vulgare L. attractive toLobesia botrana den. et schiff. females , 1992, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[14]  K. Haynes,et al.  Identification of floral compounds fromAbelia grandiflora that stimulate upwind flight in cabbage looper moths , 1991, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[15]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Opportunistic out-crossing in Nicotiana attenuata (Solanaceae), a predominantly self-fertilizing native tobacco , 2003, BMC Ecology.

[16]  N. Mitchell,et al.  Biodiversity of nematode assemblages from the region of the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone , an area of commercial mining interest , 2003 .

[17]  Mark A. Willis,et al.  Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naı̈ve hawkmoths, Manduca sexta , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Nicotiana attenuata, a model ecological expression system , 2002, CHEMOECOLOGY.

[19]  M. Gardener,et al.  The taste of nectar - a neglected area of pollination ecology , 2002 .

[20]  P. E. Scott,et al.  Use and pollination of a Hawkmoth plant, Nicotiana attenuata, by migrant hummingbirds , 2002 .

[21]  F. Roces,et al.  Honeybees assess changes in nectar flow within a single foraging bout , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Plant mediated tritrophic interaction and biological pest control , 2002 .

[23]  I. Baldwin.  An ecologically motivated analysis of plant-herbivore interactions in native tobacco. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[24]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. IV. Insect-Induced ethylene reduces jasmonate-induced nicotine accumulation by regulating putrescine N-methyltransferase transcripts. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[25]  L. S. Adler.  The ecological significance of toxic nectar , 2000 .

[26]  G. Mills,et al.  Headspace solid-phase microextraction procedures for gas chromatographic analysis of biological fluids and materials. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  Christine M. Woodcock,et al.  Exploiting chemical ecology and species diversity : stem borer and striga control for maize and sorghum in Africa , 2000 .

[28]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Ecophysiological comparison of direct and indirect defenses in Nicotiana attenuata , 2000, Oecologia.

[29]  E. Pichersky,et al.  Biochemical and molecular genetic aspects of floral scents. , 2000, Plant physiology.

[30]  C. Blem,et al.  RUFOUS HUMMINGBIRD SUCROSE PREFERENCE: PRECISION OF SELECTION VARIES WITH CONCENTRATION , 2000 .

[31]  Phillips,et al.  Resin-based defenses in conifers. , 1999, Trends in plant science.

[32]  I. Baldwin.  Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .

[34]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  Diurnal cycle of emission of induced volatile terpenoids by herbivore-injured cotton plant. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  I. Baldwin,et al.  ALLOCATION OF 15N FROM NITRATE TO NICOTINE: PRODUCTION AND TURNOVER OF A DAMAGE-INDUCED MOBILE DEFENSE' , 1994 .

[36]  J. Knudsen,et al.  Trends in floral scent chemistry in pollination syndromes: floral scent composition in moth-pollinated taxa , 1993 .

[37]  A. Stephenson.  THE ROLE OF THE EXTRAFLORAL NECTARIES OF CATALPA SPECIOSA IN LIMITING HERBIVORY AND INCREASING FRUIT PRODUCTION , 1982 .

[38]  A. Stephenson.  Toxic Nectar Deters Nectar Thieves of Catalpa speciosa , 1981 .

[39]  A. Fahn.  Secretory tissues in plants , 1979 .

[40]  P. Feinsinger,et al.  How Common are Ant-Repellent Nectars? , 1978 .

[41]  E. Crane.  On the scientific front: Dead bees under lime trees , 1977 .

[42]  H. G. Baker.  NON-SUGAR CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF NECTAR , 1977 .

[43]  R. A. Bell,et al.  Techniques for Rearing Laboratory Colonies of Tobacco Hornworms and Pink Bollworms , 1976 .

[44]  H. G. Baker.  Sugar concentrations in nectar from hummingbird flowers , 1975 .

[45]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Adaptive Radiation of Reproductive Characteristics in Angiosperms, I: Pollination Mechanisms , 1970 .

[46]  H. G. Baker.  The Adaptation of Flowering Plants to Nocturnal and Crepuscular Pollinators , 1961, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[47]  P. Wells.  An Ecological Investigation of Two Desert Tobaccos , 1959 .

[48]  A. Madden,et al.  Biology of the Tobacco Hornworm in the Southern Cigar-Tobacco District , 1945 .

[49]  A. Morgan,et al.  Notes on Amyl Salicylate as an Attrahent to the Tobacco Hornworm Moth , 1928 .