Exploring the linkage dependence of polyubiquitin conformations using molecular modeling.

Posttranslational modification of proteins by covalent attachment of a small protein ubiquitin (Ub) or a polymeric chain of Ub molecules (called polyubiquitin) is involved in controlling a vast variety of processes in eukaryotic cells. The question of how different polyubiquitin signals are recognized is central to understanding the specificity of various types of polyubiquitination. In polyubiquitin, monomers are linked to each other via an isopeptide bond between the C-terminal glycine of one Ub and a lysine of the other. The functional outcome of polyubiquitination depends on the particular lysine involved in chain formation and appears to rely on linkage-dependent conformation of polyubiquitin. Thus, K48-linked chains, a universal signal for proteasomal degradation, under physiological conditions adopt a closed conformation where functionally important residues L8, I44, and V70 are sequestered at the interface between two adjacent Ub monomers. By contrast, K63-linked chains, which act as a nonproteolytic regulatory signal, adopt an extended conformation that lacks hydrophobic interubiquitin contact. Little is known about the functional roles of the so-called "noncanonical" chains (linked via K6, K11, K27, K29, or K33, or linked head-to-tail), and no structural information on these chains is available, except for information on the crystal structure of the head-to-tail-linked diubiquitin (Ub(2)). In this study, we use molecular modeling to examine whether any of the noncanonical chains can adopt a closed conformation similar to that in K48-linked polyubiquitin. Our results show that the eight possible Ub(2) chains can be divided into two groups: chains linked via K6, K11, K27, or K48 are predicted to form a closed conformation, whereas chains linked via K29, K33, or K63, or linked head-to-tail are unable to form such a contact due to steric occlusion. These predictions are validated by the known structures of K48-, K63-, and head-to-tail-linked chains. Our study also predicts structural models for Ub(2) chains linked via K6, K11, or K27. The implications of these findings for linkage-selective recognition of noncanonical polyubiquitin signals by various receptors are discussed.

[1]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  A physical reference state unifies the structure‐derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding , 2004, Proteins.

[3]  Aydin Haririnia,et al.  Solution Conformation of Lys63-linked Di-ubiquitin Chain Provides Clues to Functional Diversity of Polyubiquitin Signaling* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  The structure and conformation of Lys63-linked tetraubiquitin. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  D. Fushman,et al.  Determining domain orientation in macromolecules by using spin-relaxation and residual dipolar coupling measurements , 2004 .

[6]  Ivan Dikic,et al.  Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals , 2008, EMBO reports.

[7]  Kenichiro Fujiwara,et al.  Structural basis for distinct roles of Lys63‐ and Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chains , 2004, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[8]  D. Fushman,et al.  Interdomain mobility in di‐ubiquitin revealed by NMR , 2006, Proteins.

[9]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[10]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Certain Pairs of Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes (E2s) and Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases (E3s) Synthesize Nondegradable Forked Ubiquitin Chains Containing All Possible Isopeptide Linkages* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Q. Deveraux,et al.  Surface hydrophobic residues of multiubiquitin chains essential for proteolytic targeting. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Pickart,et al.  Structure of tetraubiquitin shows how multiubiquitin chains can be formed. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  W. Li,et al.  Polyubiquitin chains: functions, structures, and mechanisms , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[14]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[15]  J. E. Jackson A User's Guide to Principal Components , 1991 .

[16]  Colin Kleanthous,et al.  Protein-protein recognition , 2000 .

[17]  David Komander,et al.  Molecular discrimination of structurally equivalent Lys 63‐linked and linear polyubiquitin chains , 2009, EMBO reports.

[18]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  The ubiquitin system. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[20]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  J. Janin,et al.  A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  D. Fushman,et al.  Avid interactions underlie the K63-linked polyubiquitin binding specificities observed for UBA domains , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[23]  Keith D. Wilkinson Ubiquitin: a Nobel protein. , 2004, Cell.

[24]  D. Fushman,et al.  Structural properties of polyubiquitin chains in solution. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  J M Thornton,et al.  LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[26]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Various strategies of using residual dipolar couplings in NMR‐driven protein docking: Application to Lys48‐linked di‐ubiquitin and validation against 15N‐relaxation data , 2005, Proteins.

[27]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: New features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets , 2007, Proteins.

[28]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins , 2003, Proteins.

[29]  Michael Assfalg,et al.  Structural determinants for selective recognition of a Lys48-linked polyubiquitin chain by a UBA domain. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[30]  Joshua J. Sims,et al.  Linkage-specific avidity defines the lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin-binding preference of rap80. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[31]  Junmin Peng,et al.  Dissecting the ubiquitin pathway by mass spectrometry. , 2006, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  C. Hill,et al.  Structure of a new crystal form of tetraubiquitin. , 2001, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[33]  M. Carson,et al.  Structure of a diubiquitin conjugate and a model for interaction with ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (E2). , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[34]  Markus Ringnér,et al.  What is principal component analysis? , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  B Honig,et al.  Electrostatic contributions to protein–protein interactions: Fast energetic filters for docking and their physical basis , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  D. Fushman,et al.  Effects of cyclization on conformational dynamics and binding properties of Lys48‐linked di‐ubiquitin , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  Crystal structure and solution NMR studies of Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin at neutral pH. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Linda Hicke,et al.  Ubiquitin-binding domains , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  D. Fushman,et al.  Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[41]  D. Fushman,et al.  A model of interdomain mobility in a multidomain protein. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  Denise Gorse,et al.  Morphological aspects of oligomeric protein structures. , 2005, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[43]  David E. Booth,et al.  Chemometrics: Data Analysis for the Laboratory and Chemical Plant , 2004, Technometrics.