An unusual case of ascending aorta dissection 4 years after perceval sutureless bioprosthesis implantation: Easier access to diagnosis through the right parasternal longitudinal echocardiographic window

Sutureless bioprostheses are more frequently used for the surgical treatment of elderly patients with high burden of comorbidity, who are candidates to aortic valve replacement (AVR). Among the sutureless bioprostheses, the Perceval valve has shown a good midterm durability, with very few reports of valve deterioration and low risk of complications. Herein, we present an unusual case of ascending aorta dissection which occurred 4 years after AVR with a Perceval sutureless pericardial bioprosthesis, likely related to the peculiar prosthetic design. A high right parasternal longitudinal view of the aorta in the right lateral decubitus allowed to suspect the acute aortic syndrome, thus accelerating the subsequent diagnostic and therapeutic iter.

[1]  G. Torregrossa,et al.  Benefits and Pitfalls of the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis , 2022, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[2]  G. Bianchi,et al.  Right anterior mini-thoracotomy and sutureless valves: the perfect marriage. , 2020, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[3]  U. Bortolotti,et al.  Early aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement with a Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis , 2019, Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[4]  D. Bouchard,et al.  Ten-year experience with the Perceval S sutureless prosthesis: lessons learned and future perspectives. , 2018, Journal of visualized surgery.

[5]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Can Perceval sutureless valve reduce the rate of patient-prosthesis mismatch?† , 2017, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  C. Adams,et al.  The Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve , 2017, Innovations.

[7]  Dimitris Mavridis,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2016, European heart journal.

[8]  C. Indolfi,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, Annals of internal medicine.

[9]  D. Bouchard,et al.  First case of Perceval S prosthesis early structural valve deterioration: Not an easy reoperation. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  M. Carrier,et al.  Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement in the Setting of Triple-Valve Surgery , 2015, Innovations.

[11]  M. Misfeld Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using the Perceval S sutureless valve. , 2015, Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

[12]  K. Teoh,et al.  Perceval Sutureless Valve – are Sutureless Valves Here? , 2014, Current cardiology reviews.

[13]  G. Santarpino,et al.  The Perceval S aortic valve has the potential of shortening surgical time: does it also result in improved outcome? , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[14]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Aortic dissection: a comparative study of diagnosis with spiral CT, multiplanar transesophageal echocardiography, and MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[15]  F. Biancari,et al.  Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.