Reconstruction of the Water Table from Self‐Potential Data: A Bayesian Approach

Ground water flow associated with pumping and injection tests generates self-potential signals that can be measured at the ground surface and used to estimate the pattern of ground water flow at depth. We propose an inversion of the self-potential signals that accounts for the heterogeneous nature of the aquifer and a relationship between the electrical resistivity and the streaming current coupling coefficient. We recast the inversion of the self-potential data into a Bayesian framework. Synthetic tests are performed showing the advantage in using self-potential signals in addition to in situ measurements of the potentiometric levels to reconstruct the shape of the water table. This methodology is applied to a new data set from a series of coordinated hydraulic tomography, self-potential, and electrical resistivity tomography experiments performed at the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Idaho. In particular, we examine one of the dipole hydraulic tests and its reciprocal to show the sensitivity of the self-potential signals to variations of the potentiometric levels under steady-state conditions. However, because of the high pumping rate, the response was also influenced by the Reynolds number, especially near the pumping well for a given test. Ground water flow in the inertial laminar flow regime is responsible for nonlinearity that is not yet accounted for in self-potential tomography. Numerical modeling addresses the sensitivity of the self-potential response to this problem.

[1]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations , 2005 .

[2]  Jörg Renner,et al.  Self‐potential signals induced by periodic pumping tests , 2008 .

[3]  Michael D. Knoll,et al.  Reflectivity Modeling of a Ground-Penetrating-Radar Profile of a Saturated Fluvial Formation , 2006 .

[4]  A. Revil,et al.  Electrical properties of zeolitized volcaniclastic materials , 2002 .

[5]  Philippe Labazuy,et al.  The volcano‐electric effect , 2003 .

[6]  W. Barrash,et al.  Hierarchical geostatistics and multifacies systems: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho , 2002 .

[7]  S. Finsterle,et al.  Electrokinetic coupling in unsaturated porous media. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[8]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models , 2002 .

[9]  J. Avouac,et al.  Electric potential variations associated with yearly lake level variations , 1998 .

[10]  Salvatore Straface,et al.  Self‐potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments , 2004 .

[11]  André Revil,et al.  Groundwater redox conditions and conductivity in a contaminant plume from geoelectrical investigations , 2004 .

[12]  W. P. Clement,et al.  Crosshole Radar Tomography in a Fluvial Aquifer Near Boise, Idaho , 2006 .

[13]  André Revil,et al.  Tomography of the Darcy velocity from self‐potential measurements , 2007 .

[14]  P. Donaldson,et al.  Geophysical Surveys across the Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site To Determine Geophysical Parameters of a Shallow, Alluvial Aquifer (1999) , 1999 .

[15]  W. Barrash,et al.  Significance of porosity for stratigraphy and textural composition in subsurface, coarse fluvial deposits: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site , 2004 .

[16]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Migration methods for imaging different‐order multiples , 2007 .

[17]  Thomas P. Minka,et al.  Gates , 2008, NIPS.

[18]  Tohru Watanabe,et al.  Deviation of linear relation between streaming potential and pore fluid pressure difference in granular material at relatively high Reynolds numbers , 2006 .

[19]  W. P. Clement,et al.  CROSSHOLE RADAR TOMOGRAPHY IN AN ALLUVIAL AQUIFER NEAR BOISE, IDAHO , 2006 .

[20]  Niklas Linde,et al.  Estimation of the water table throughout a catchment using self-potential and piezometric data in a Bayesian framework , 2007 .

[21]  André Revil,et al.  A Sandbox Experiment of Self‐Potential Signals Associated with a Pumping Test , 2004 .

[22]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Three-dimensional modelling of streaming potential , 2007 .

[23]  André Revil,et al.  A new formulation to compute self-potential signals associated with ground water flow , 2007 .

[24]  André Revil,et al.  Permeability of shaly sands , 1999 .

[25]  André Revil,et al.  Pore-scale heterogeneity, energy dissipation and the transport properties of rocks , 1995 .

[26]  A. Revil,et al.  Ionic Diffusivity, Electrical Conductivity, Membrane and Thermoelectric Potentials in Colloids and Granular Porous Media: A Unified Model. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[27]  G. Quincke Ueber eine neue Art elektrischer Ströme , 1859 .

[28]  A. Revil,et al.  Characterization of transport properties of argillaceous sediments: Application to the Callovo‐Oxfordian argillite , 2005 .

[29]  L. Slater,et al.  Self potential improves characterization of hydraulically‐active fractures from azimuthal geoelectrical measurements , 2006 .

[30]  Michael D. Knoll,et al.  Multivariate analysis of cross‐hole georadar velocity and attenuation tomograms for aquifer zonation , 2004 .

[31]  A. Revil,et al.  A triple-layer model of the surface electrochemical properties of clay minerals. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[32]  M. Voltz,et al.  Monitoring of an infiltration experiment using the self‐potential method , 2006 .

[33]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potentials of granular media: Influence of the Dukhin and Reynolds numbers , 2007 .

[34]  L. Slater,et al.  Fracture anisotropy characterization in crystalline bedrock using field-scale azimuthal self potential gradient , 2008 .

[35]  T. Ishido,et al.  Experimental and theoretical basis of electrokinetic phenomena in rock‐water systems and its applications to geophysics , 1981 .

[36]  A. Binley,et al.  Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imaging , 2001 .

[37]  A. Binley,et al.  Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross‐hole electrical resistance and ground‐penetrating radar traveltime data , 2006 .

[38]  N. Linde,et al.  Chemico-electromechanical coupling in microporous media. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[39]  Jacques R. Ernst,et al.  Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data , 2007 .

[40]  S. Troisi,et al.  Numerical modelling of self-potential signals associated with a pumping test experiment , 2005 .

[41]  A. Revil,et al.  Three‐dimensional inversion of self‐potential data used to constrain the pattern of groundwater flow in geothermal fields , 2008 .

[42]  Tom Clemo,et al.  Field, laboratory, and modeling investigation of the skin effect at wells with slotted casing, Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site , 2006 .

[43]  Shingo Yoshida,et al.  Effect of the flow state on streaming current , 2005 .

[44]  R. Knight,et al.  Improving crosshole radar velocity tomograms: A new approach to incorporating high-angle traveltime data , 2007 .

[45]  André Revil,et al.  Self‐potential signals associated with variations of the hydraulic head during an infiltration experiment , 2002 .

[46]  George Keith Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. , 1969 .

[47]  Francis S. Birch,et al.  Testing Fournier's Method for Finding Water Table from Self‐Potential , 1993 .

[48]  J. Scales,et al.  Resolution of seismic waveform inversion: Bayes versus Occam , 1997 .

[49]  A. Revil Comment on “Effect of the flow state on streaming current” by Osamu Kuwano, Masao Nakatani, and Shingo Yoshida , 2007 .

[50]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potential in porous media: 2. Theory and application to geothermal systems , 1999 .

[51]  Ralph C. Heath,et al.  WHAT ABOUT GROUND WATER , 1973 .

[52]  L. Cathles,et al.  Electrical conductivity in shaly sands with geophysical applications , 1998 .

[53]  A. Revil,et al.  Constitutive equations for ionic transport in porous shales , 2004 .

[54]  Claude Doussan,et al.  Variations of self-potential and unsaturated water flow with time in sandy loam and clay loam soils , 2002 .

[55]  A. Revil,et al.  Detection of preferential infiltration pathways in sinkholes using joint inversion of self‐potential and EM‐34 conductivity data , 2007 .

[56]  A. Revil,et al.  Hysteresis of the self‐potential response associated with harmonic pumping tests , 2008 .

[57]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[58]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[59]  A. Revil,et al.  Influence of the Dukhin and Reynolds numbers on the apparent zeta potential of granular porous media. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[60]  Anthony Finizola,et al.  Fluid circulation at Stromboli volcano (Aeolian Islands, Italy) from self-potential and CO2 surveys , 2002 .

[61]  A. Ogilvy,et al.  DEFORMATIONS OF NATURAL ELECTRIC FIELDS NEAR DRAINAGE STRUCTURES , 1973 .

[62]  G. Bourrié,et al.  Redox potential distribution inferred from self‐potential measurements associated with the corrosion of a burden metallic body , 2008 .

[63]  Nicolas Florsch,et al.  Least squares inversion of self‐potential (SP) data and application to the shallow flow of ground water in sinkholes , 2006 .

[64]  S. Troisi,et al.  An Inverse Procedure to Estimate Transmissivity from Heads and SP Signals , 2007, Ground water.

[65]  Claude Fournier,et al.  Spontaneous potentials and resistivity surveys applied to hydrogeology in a volcanic area: case history of the Chaîne des Puys (Puy-de-Dôme, France) , 1989 .