Comparison of emerging ground propulsion systems for electrified aircraft taxi operations

Abstract Aviation is a mode with high fuel consumption per passenger mile and has significant environmental impacts. It is important to seek ways to reduce fuel consumption by the aviation sector, but it is difficult to improve fuel efficiency during the en-route cruise phase of flight because of technology barriers, safety requirements, and the mode of operations of air transportation. Recent efforts have emphasized the development of innovative Aircraft Ground Propulsion Systems (AGPS) for electrified aircraft taxi operations. These new technologies are expected to significantly reduce aircraft ground-movement-related fuel burn and emissions. This study compares various emerging AGPS systems and presents a comprehensive review on the merits and demerits of each system, followed with the local environmental impacts assessment of these systems. Using operational data for the 10 busiest U.S. airports, a comparison of environmental impacts is performed for four kinds of AGPS: conventional, single engine-on, external, and on-board systems. The results show that there are tradeoffs in fuel and emissions among these emerging technologies. On-board system shows the best performance in the emission reduction, while external system shows the least fuel burn. Compared to single-engine scenario, external AGPS shows the reduction of HC and CO emissions but the increase of NO x emission. When a general indicator is considered, on-board AGPS shows the best potential of reducing local environmental impacts. The benefit-cost analysis shows that both external and on-board systems are worth being implemented and the on-board system appeals to be more beneficial.

[1]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Methods for Determining Airport Unimpeded Taxi Times , 2011 .

[2]  Fabrizio Re.  Assessing Environmental Benefits of Electric Aircraft Taxiing through Object-Oriented Simulation , 2012 .

[3]  Harshad Khadilkar,et al.  DEMONSTRATION OF REDUCED AIRPORT CONGESTION THROUGH PUSHBACK RATE CONTROL , 2014 .

[4]  S. Khardi,et al.  Comparison of methodologies estimating emissions of aircraft pollutants, environmental impact assessment around airports , 2011 .

[5]  Kevin Morrow,et al.  Cost Benefit Analysis Modeling Tool for Electric vs. ICE Airport Ground Support Equipment – Development and Results , 2007 .

[6]  Parth Vaishnav,et al.  Low-hanging fruit? The costs and benefits of reducing fuel burn and emissions from taxiing aircraft , 2012 .

[7]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation for aircraft departure trajectories minimising noise annoyance , 2010 .

[8]  M. Baucus.  Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[9]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  Evaluating ground–air network vulnerabilities in an integrated terminal maneuvering area using co-evolutionary computational red teaming , 2013 .

[10]  Lance Sherry,et al.  ANALYSIS OF EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR “SINGLE-ENGINE TAXI-OUT” OPERATIONS , 2008 .

[11]  Chris Gerada,et al.  Feasibility and electromagnetic design of direct drive wheel actuator for green taxiing , 2011, 2011 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition.

[12]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Potential for Fuel Reduction through Electric Taxiing , 2011 .

[13]  Michael O. Ball,et al.  Stochastic optimization models for ground delay program planning with equity–efficiency tradeoffs , 2013 .

[14]  Daniel DeLaurentis,et al.  Evaluation of Continuous Descent Approach as a Standard Terminal Airspace Operation , 2011 .

[15]  Bruce Goldberg,et al.  Sitting on the runway : current aircraft taxi times now exceed pre-9/11 experience , 2008 .

[16]  F. Re.  Viability and state of the art of environmentally friendly aircraft taxiing systems , 2012, 2012 Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion.

[17]  Yoon C. Jung,et al.  Tower Controllers' Assessment of the Spot and Runway Departure Advisor (SARDA) Concept , 2011 .

[18]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Applying Regression Models to Benchmark Airport Taxiing Performance Indicators , 2011 .

[19]  Tasos Nikoleris,et al.  Detailed estimation of fuel consumption and emissions during aircraft taxi operations at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport , 2011 .

[20]  Kenneth Kuhn,et al.  Ground delay program planning: Delay, equity, and computational complexity , 2013 .

[21]  Bin Yu,et al.  An improved pavement maintenance optimization methodology: Integrating LCA and LCCA , 2013 .

[22]  H. Balakrishnan,et al.  Evaluation of strategies for reducing taxi-out emissions at airports , 2009 .