The Role of Top-Down Task Context in Learning to Perceive Objects

In high-level perceptual regions of the ventral visual pathway in humans, experience shapes the functional properties of the cortex: the fusiform face area responds most strongly to faces of familiar rather than unfamiliar races, and the visual word form area (VWFA) is tuned only to familiar orthographies. But are these regions affected only by the bottom-up stimulus information they receive during learning, or does the effect of perceptual experience depend on the way that stimulus information is used during learning? Here, we test the hypothesis that top-down influences (i.e., task context) modulate the effect of perceptual experience on functional selectivities of the high-level visual cortex. Specifically, we test whether experience with novel visual stimuli produces a greater effect on the VWFA when those stimuli are associated with meanings (via association learning) but produces a greater effect on shape-processing regions when trained in a discrimination task without associated meanings. Our result supports this hypothesis and further shows that learning is transferred to novel objects that share parts with the trained objects. Thus, the effects of experience on selectivities of the high-level visual cortex depend on the task context in which that experience occurs and the perceptual processing strategy by which objects are encoded during learning.

[1]  R. Jacobs Computational studies of the development of functionally specialized neural modules , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Kuniyoshi L Sakai,et al.  Learning letters in adulthood: direct visualization of cortical plasticity for forming a new link between orthography and phonology. , 2004, Neuron.

[3]  Gui Xue,et al.  Language experience shapes fusiform activation when processing a logographic artificial language: An fMRI training study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[4]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Beyond Shape: How You Learn about Objects Affects How They Are Represented in Visual Cortex , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Subordinate Categorization Enhances the Neural Selectivity in Human Object-selective Cortex for Fine Shape Differences , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Categorization Training Results in Shape- and Category-Selective Human Neural Plasticity , 2007, Neuron.

[9]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Frederic Dick,et al.  Differential Lateralization for Words and Faces: Category or Psychophysics? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Stephen D. Mayhew,et al.  Article Learning Shapes the Representation of Behavioral Choice in the Human Brain , 2022 .

[15]  A. Nowicka,et al.  Visual-spatial-frequency model of cerebral asymmetry: a critical survey of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  N. Kanwisher Faces and places: of central (and peripheral) interest , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  C. Baker,et al.  The neural basis of visual object learning , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortexYasushi Miyashita , 1988, Nature.

[21]  T. Givón,et al.  Brain Plasticity in Learning Visual Words , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[23]  Alex Martin,et al.  A neural system for learning about object function. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Clustering of perirhinal neurons with similar properties following visual experience in adult monkeys , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Y. Yamane,et al.  Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[27]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  Decoding the Representation of Multiple Simultaneous Objects in Human Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[28]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Macaque Perirhinal Neurons during and after Visual Stimulus Association Learning , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-Down Reorganization of Activity in the Visual Pathway after Learning a Shape Identification Task , 2005, Neuron.

[31]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon , 2005, NeuroImage.

[32]  T. Albright,et al.  Remembering Visual Motion: Neural Correlates of Associative Plasticity and Motion Recall in Cortical Area MT , 2007, Neuron.

[33]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Word and non-word reading: What role for the Visual Word Form Area? , 2005, NeuroImage.

[34]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Learning and neural plasticity in visual object recognition , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  R Todd Constable,et al.  The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: A contrast of different training conditions , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[39]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[40]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Discrimination Training Alters Object Representations in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Jia Liu,et al.  Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: An fMRI Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[48]  L. Squire,et al.  Neuronal representations of stimulus associations develop in the temporal lobe during learning , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual Learning of Object Shape , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[51]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Visual Perceptual Learning of Words: Implications for the Visual Word Form Area Hypothesis , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Laurie S. Glezer,et al.  Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2009, Neuron.

[53]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[54]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[55]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[56]  Gabriele Janzen,et al.  Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  Tali Bitan,et al.  Effects of alphabeticality, practice and type of instruction on reading an artificial script: an fMRI study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[58]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.