The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics.

OBJECTIVE To review the literature that evaluates the influence of trunk motion on trunk strength and structural loading. BACKGROUND In recent years, trunk dynamics have been identified as potential risk factors for developing low-back disorders. Consequently, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in trunk motion is needed. METHODS This review summarizes the results of 53 studies that have evaluated trunk motion and its impact on several biomechanical outcome measures. The biomechanical measures consisted of trunk strength, intra-abdominal pressure, muscle activity, imposed trunk moments, and spinal loads. Each of these biomechanical measures was discussed in relation to the existing knowledge within each plane of motion (extension, flexion, lateral flexion, twisting, and asymmetric extension). RESULTS Trunk strength was drastically reduced as dynamic motion increased, and males were impacted more than females. Intra-abdominal pressure seemed to only be affected by trunk dynamics at high levels of force. Trunk moments were found to increase monotonically with increased trunk motion. Both agonistic and antagonistic muscle activities were greater as dynamic characteristics increased. As a result, the three-dimensional spinal loads increase significantly for dynamic exertions as compared to isometric conditions. CONCLUSIONS Trunk motion has a dramatic affect on the muscle coactivity, which seems to be the underlying source for the decrease strength capability as well as the increased muscle force, IAP, and spinal loads. This review suggests that the ability of the individual to perform a task "safely" might be significantly compromised by the muscle coactivity that accompanies dynamic exertions. It is also important to consider various workplace and individual factors when attempting to reduce the impact of trunk motions during dynamic exertions. Relevance This review provides insight as to why trunk motions are important risk factors to consider when attempting to control low-back disorders in the workplace. It is apparent that trunk motion increases the risk of low-back disorders. To better control low-back disorders in industry, more comprehensive knowledge about the impact of trunk motion is needed. A better understanding of muscle coactivity may ultimately lead to reducing the risk associated with dynamic exertions.

[1]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Influence of Dynamic Factors and External Loads on the Moment at the Lumbar Spine in Lifting , 1988, Spine.

[2]  G. Waddell,et al.  Trunk strength testing with iso-machines. Part 2: Experimental evaluation of the Cybex II Back Testing System in normal subjects and patients with chronic low back pain. , 1993, Spine.

[3]  W. Marras,et al.  The force-velocity relation and intra-abdominal pressure during lifting activities. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[4]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  A biomechanical evaluation of lifting speed using work- and moment-related measures. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[5]  J. Y. Kim,et al.  Quantitative trunk muscle electromyography during lifting at different speeds , 1987 .

[6]  M. Adams,et al.  Time-dependent changes in the lumbar spine's resistancc to bending , 1996 .

[7]  R. Norman,et al.  A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  T. Gómez,et al.  Normative Database for Trunk Range of Motion, Strength, Velocity, and Endurance with the Isostation B-200 Lumbar Dynamometer , 1991, Spine.

[9]  W S Marras,et al.  An Assessment of Complex Spinal Loads During Dynamic Lifting Tasks , 1998, Spine.

[10]  K P Granata,et al.  MRI-derived moment-arms of the female and male spine loading muscles. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  A. E. Engin,et al.  Viscoelastic Finite-Element Analysis of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Combined Compression and Sagittal Flexion: Effect of Loading Rate , 2000, Spine.

[12]  T B Leamon,et al.  Research to reality: a critical review of the validity of various criteria for the prevention of occupationally induced low back pain disability. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[13]  W. Marras,et al.  Trunk Force Development during Static and Dynamic Lifts , 1987, Human factors.

[14]  N. Langrana,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Back Strength Using Isokinetic Testing , 1984, Spine.

[15]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression , 1986, Spine.

[16]  W S Marras,et al.  Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[17]  W S Marras,et al.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of Trunk Response to Asymmetric Trunk Motion , 1992, Spine.

[18]  J. Y. Kim,et al.  Quantification and classification of low back disorders based on trunk motion , 1993 .

[19]  W. Marras,et al.  Variation in spinal load and trunk dynamics during repeated lifting exertions. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  Avis,et al.  Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles , 2001 .

[21]  W S Marras,et al.  Intra-abdominal pressure during trunk extension motions. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  M. Nordin,et al.  The Relationship of Torque, Velocity, and Power with Constant Resistive Load During Sagittal Trunk Movement , 1990, Spine.

[23]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  The role of the abdominal musculature in the elevation of the intra-abdominal pressure during specified tasks. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[24]  W. Marras,et al.  Trunk muscle activities during asymmetric twisting motions. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[25]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Trunk muscle strength during constant velocity movements. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures. Differences and similarities between low-back-injured and noninjured workers. , 1993, Spine.

[27]  Shrawan Kumar.  Isolated planar trunk strengths measurement in normals: Part III — Results and database , 1996 .

[28]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Finite-Element Evaluation of Contact Loads on Facets of an L2-L3 Lumbar Segment in Complex Loads , 1991, Spine.

[29]  T. Ito,et al.  Trunk-muscle strength during concentric and eccentric contraction: a comparison between healthy subjects and patients with chronic low-back pain. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[30]  S. McGill,et al.  Measured and modelled static and dynamic axial trunk torsion during twisting in males and females. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[31]  M Parnianpour,et al.  The dynamic response of L(2)/L(3) motion segment in cyclic axial compressive loading. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  R M Aspden,et al.  Intra-abdominal pressure and its role in spinal mechanics. , 1987, Clinical biomechanics.

[33]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Load-bearing role of facets in a lumbar segment under sagittal plane loadings. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  S. McGill.  A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  W S Marras,et al.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[36]  William S. Marras,et al.  Trunk motion during lifting: The relative cost , 1986 .

[37]  M Szpalski,et al.  Classification of Low Back Pain From Dynamic Motion Characteristics Using an Artificial Neural Network , 1997, Spine.

[38]  T. Mayer,et al.  Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. , 1984, Spine.

[39]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Isometric and isokinetic back and arm lifting strengths: device and measurement. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  M Gagnon,et al.  Muscular mechanical energy expenditure as a process for detecting potential risks in manual materials handling. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  K A Khalaf,et al.  Modeling of functional trunk muscle performance: interfacing ergonomics and spine rehabilitation in response to the ADA. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[42]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.

[43]  Kermit G. Davis,et al.  Assessment of the Relationship between Box Weight and Trunk Kinematics: Does a Reduction in Box Weight Necessarily Correspond to a Decrease in Spinal Loading? , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[44]  H M Toussaint,et al.  Dynamic forces acting on the lumbar spine during manual handling. Can they be estimated using electromyographic techniques alone? , 1999, Spine.

[45]  W S Marras,et al.  Quantification of back motion during asymmetric lifting. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[46]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Strain in Fibers of a Lumbar Disc: Analysis of the Role of Lifting in Producing Disc Prolapse , 1989, Spine.

[47]  M Gagnon,et al.  The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  S. Siegler,et al.  Analysis of Lumbar Spine and Hip Motion During Forward Bending in Subjects With and Without a History of Low Back Pain , 1996, Spine.

[49]  J. Malchaire,et al.  Static and dynamic characteristics of the trunk and history of low back pain , 1993 .

[50]  B. Bresler,et al.  Role of the Trunk in Stability of the Spine , 1961 .

[51]  S. Simon,et al.  The effect of fatigue on multijoint kinematics, coordination, and postural stability during a repetitive lifting test. , 1997, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[52]  T P Leskinen,et al.  A dynamic analysis of spinal compression with different lifting techniques. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[53]  S. Smith,et al.  Quantification of Lumbar Function: Part 1: Isometric and Multispeed Isokinetic Trunk Strength Measures in Sagittal and Axial Planes in Normal Subjects , 1985, Spine.

[54]  K. Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Influence of weight and frequency on thigh and lower-trunk motion during repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat techniques. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[55]  L Lindbeck,et al.  Inertial effects from single body segments in dynamic analysis of lifting. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[56]  W. Marras,et al.  The Role of Complex, Simultaneous Trunk Motions in the Risk of Occupation‐Related Low Back Disorders , 1998, Spine.

[57]  D G Wilder,et al.  The Relationship Between Anthropometric, Postural, Muscular, and Mobility Characteristics of Males Ages 18–55 , 1985, Spine.

[58]  T. Mayer,et al.  Quantification of Lumbar Function: Part 4: Isometric and Isokinetic Lifting Simulation in Normal Subjects and Low-Back Dysfunction Patients , 1985, Spine.

[59]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Influence of dynamic factors on the lumbar spine moment in lifting. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[60]  R. Lin,et al.  Rate-related fatigue injury of vertebral disc under axial cyclic loading in a porcine body-disc-body unit. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[61]  W. Marras,et al.  Flexibility and velocity of the normal and impaired lumbar spine. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[62]  William S. Marras,et al.  A Biomechanical Assessment of Axial Twisting Exertions , 1995 .

[63]  P G Dempsey,et al.  Evaluation of the ability of power to predict low frequency lifting capacity. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[64]  M Parnianpour,et al.  The effects of resistance level on muscle coordination patterns and movement profile during trunk extension. , 1993, Spine.

[65]  W. Marras,et al.  Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[66]  T. Waters,et al.  Evaluation of spinal loading during lowering and lifting. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[67]  W S Marras,et al.  Measurements of Loads on the Lumbar Spine Under Isometric and Isokinetic Conditions , 1984, Spine.

[68]  J. Y. Kim,et al.  The quantification of low back disorder using motion measures. Methodology and validation. , 1999, Spine.

[69]  S. McGill,et al.  Dynamic loading affects the mechanical properties and failure site of porcine spines. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[70]  L. Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Comparison of spinal mobility and isometric trunk extensor forces with electromyographic spectral analysis in identifying low back pain. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[71]  W. Marras,et al.  The Influence of Trunk Muscle Coactivity on Dynamic Spinal Loads , 1995, Spine.

[72]  Shrawan Kumar,et al.  Human Trunk Strength Profile in Lateral Flexion and Axial Rotation , 1995, Spine.

[73]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[74]  M. Jayson,et al.  Gender variation of human spinal and paraspinal structures. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[75]  I A Kuorinka,et al.  A Comparison of Intraabdominal Pressure Increases, Hip Torque, and Lumbar Vertebral Compression in Different Lifting Techniques , 1983, Human factors.

[76]  M. Nordin,et al.  1988 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: The Triaxial Coupling of Torque Generation of Trunk Muscles during Isometric Exertions and the Effect of Fatiguing Isoinertial Movements on the Motor Output and Movement Patterns , 1988, Spine.

[77]  W S Marras,et al.  Electromyographic studies of the lumbar trunk musculature during the generation of low‐level trunk acceleration , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[78]  J. King,et al.  Mechanical Disorders of the Low Back , 1975 .

[79]  Gary A. Mirka,et al.  An Investigation of the Variability in Human Performance during Sagittally Symmetric Lifting Tasks , 1996 .

[80]  M D Grabiner,et al.  Paraspinal Precontraction Does Not Enhance Isokinetic Trunk Extension Performance , 1994, Spine.

[81]  T. Gómez,et al.  Symmetry of lumbar rotation and lateral flexion range of motion and isometric strength in subjects with and without low back pain. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[82]  S Gallagher,et al.  Trunk Extension Strength and Muscle Activity in Standing and Kneeling Postures , 1997, Spine.

[83]  M. Nordin,et al.  A Database of Isoinertial Trunk Strength Tests against Three Resistance Levels in Sagittal, Frontal, and Transverse Planes in Normal Male Subjects , 1989, Spine.

[84]  W S Marras,et al.  Impairment magnification during dynamic trunk motions. , 2000, Spine.

[85]  S. McGill.  The Influence of Lordosis on Axial Trunk Torque and Trunk Muscle Myoelectric Activity , 1992, Spine.

[86]  William S. Marras,et al.  Three dimensional dynamic motor performance of the normal trunk , 1990 .

[87]  R W Norman,et al.  Reassessment of the role of intra-abdominal pressure in spinal compression. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[88]  W S Marras,et al.  Simulift: A Simulation Model of Human Trunk Motion , 1989, Spine.

[89]  P. Dolan,et al.  The relationship between EMG activity and extensor moment generation in the erector spinae muscles during bending and lifting activities. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[90]  W S Marras,et al.  Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[91]  T. Hansson,et al.  Muscular and kinematic behavior of the lumbar spine during flexion-extension. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[92]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[93]  W S Marras,et al.  Trunk Strength during Asymmetric Trunk Motion , 1989, Human factors.

[94]  G B Andersson,et al.  The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[95]  S. Simon,et al.  The Effect of Fatigue on Multijoint Kinematics and Load Sharing During a Repetitive Lifting Test , 1997, Spine.

[96]  D. McIntyre,et al.  The characteristics of preferred low-back motion. , 1990, Journal of spinal disorders.

[97]  K P Granata,et al.  Changes in Trunk Dynamics and Spine Loading During Repeated Trunk Exertions , 1997, Spine.

[98]  P. R. Davis,et al.  Spinal loading in static and dynamic postures: EMG and intra-abdominal pressure study. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[99]  M. Adams,et al.  Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[100]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[101]  S R Simon,et al.  The Classification of Anatomic‐ and Symptom‐based Low Back Disorders Using Motion Measure Models , 1995, Spine.

[102]  S. Hall.  Effect of attempted lifting speed on forces and torque exerted on the lumbar spine. , 1985, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[103]  D. McIntyre,et al.  A comparison of the characteristics of preferred low-back motion of normal subjects and low-back-pain patients. , 1991, Journal of spinal disorders.

[104]  S. Siegler,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of Lumbar and Hip Motion While Rising From a Forward, Flexed Position in Patients With and Without a History of Low Back Pain , 1997, Spine.

[105]  Shrawan Kumar.  Isolated planar trunk strength and mobility measurement for the normal and impaired backs: Part I — The devices , 1996 .

[106]  P. Dolan,et al.  Time-dependent changes in the lumbar spine's resistance to bending. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[107]  M. de Looze,et al.  Joint moments and muscle activity in the lower extremities and lower back in lifting and lowering tasks. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[108]  Y. K. Liu,et al.  Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[109]  S M McGill,et al.  Mechanical properties and failure mechanics of the spine under posterior shear load: observations from a porcine model. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[110]  K P Granata,et al.  Female and male trunk geometry: size and prediction of the spine loading trunk muscles derived from MRI. , 2001, Clinical biomechanics.

[111]  K P Granata,et al.  Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[112]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Torso muscle moment arms at intervertebral levels T10 through L5 from CT scans on eleven male and eight female subjects. , 1993, Spine.

[113]  William S. Marras.  Predictions of forces acting upon the lumbar spine under isometric and isokinetic conditions: A model-experiment comparison , 1988 .

[114]  S Kumar,et al.  Static and dynamic lifting strength at different reach distances in symmetrical and asymmetrical planes. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[115]  W S. Marras,et al.  The development of an EMG-assisted model to assess spine loading during whole-body free-dynamic lifting. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[116]  S Kumar.  Lumbosacral compression in maximal lifting efforts in sagittal plane with varying mechanical disadvantage in isometric and isokinetic modes. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[117]  R W Norman,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4/L5 joint. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[118]  H M Toussaint,et al.  The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[119]  W. Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: II. Model Validation , 1991, Human factors.

[120]  T. Mayer,et al.  Quantification of Lumbar Function: Part 3: Preliminary Data on Isokinetic Torso Rotation Testing with Myoelectric Spectral Analysis in Normal and Low-Back Pain Subjects , 1985, Spine.

[121]  A Luttmann,et al.  The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling. , 1992, Ergonomics.