Students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning

The purpose of this study was to evaluate students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning in a Physical Geography undergraduate class. A convenience sample of 24 undergraduate students registered in a physical geography course was assigned clickers to answer chapter quizzes in class for 15 weeks during the semester. Data from student interviews, student surveys, and exam grades were used to analyze the findings. Overall, students were satisfied and gave high approval ratings for the use of clickers, particularly for enhancing their participation and engagement in class lectures. The study findings show that clickers promote student engagement in the teaching and learning process. However, students did not find clickers to be a motivating factor to study more for the course. The implications for the use of clickers as instructional tools to improve active teaching and learning in technology-rich classrooms are also discussed.

[1]  Paul Raymond Pinet.  Rediscovering Geologic Principles by Collaborative Learning , 1995 .

[2]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier , 1991 .

[3]  Wei Pan,et al.  Examining the Effectiveness of Innovative Instructional Methods on Reducing Statistics Anxiety for Graduate Students in the Social Sciences. , 2004 .

[4]  Jeffrey T Johnson,et al.  Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education. , 2005, Journal of dental education.

[5]  Lisa Greer,et al.  Real-Time Analysis of Student Comprehension: An Assessment of Electronic Student Response Technology in an Introductory Earth Science Course , 2004 .

[6]  Scott R. Homan,et al.  Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes , 2008 .

[7]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  Kevin Johnson,et al.  Clickers in the Laboratory: Student Thoughts and Views , 2010 .

[10]  Quintin Cutts,et al.  Electronically enhanced classroom interaction , 2002 .

[11]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[12]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Psychology in Learning and Instruction , 2005 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[14]  Douglas Duncan,et al.  Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems , 2004 .

[15]  Steve Feyl,et al.  Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education: Improving Research Writing Skills in a Writing-Emphasis Health Counseling Course , 2004 .

[16]  Meghan D. McAuliffe,et al.  Efficacy of Personal Response Systems (“Clickers”) in Large, Introductory Psychology Classes , 2008 .

[17]  Maria Meletiou-Mavrotheris,et al.  ENHANCING STATISTICS INSTRUCTION IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT , 2009 .

[18]  J. Stowell,et al.  Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion , 2007 .

[19]  R. Glaser.  The Reemergence of Learning Theory within Instructional Research. , 1990 .

[20]  Anna Carlin,et al.  Waking the Dead: Using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom , 2004, AMCIS.

[21]  Michael Lane,et al.  Using Clickers to Support Information Literacy Skills Development and Instruction in First-Year Business Students , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[22]  David N. Steer,et al.  Assessment and Active Learning Strategies for Introductory Geology Courses , 2003 .

[23]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .

[24]  Maria Meletiou-Mavrotheris.  Technological Tools in the Introductory Statistics Classroom: Effects on Student Understanding of Inferential Statistics , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[25]  R. Mayer.  Rote Versus Meaningful Learning , 2002 .

[26]  Nancy E. Perry,et al.  Investigating Teacher-Student Interactions That Foster Self-Regulated Learning , 2002 .

[27]  E. Wit.  Who wants to be… The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching , 2003 .

[28]  Eugene Judson,et al.  Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls , 2002 .

[29]  J. Ducette,et al.  Facilitation of Formative Assessments Using Clickers in a University Physics Course , 2011 .

[30]  A. Chickering,et al.  Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Under graduate Education , 1991 .

[31]  Cheryl A. Moredich,et al.  Engaging Students Through the Use of Classroom Response Systems , 2007, Nurse educator.

[32]  Pascal de Caprariis,et al.  Impediments to Providing Scientific Literacy to Students in Introductory Survey Courses , 1997 .

[33]  Herbert S. Lin,et al.  They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier , 1991 .

[34]  Beverly Dolinsky,et al.  An Active Learning Approach to Teaching Statistics. , 2001 .

[35]  G. DeBourgh,et al.  Use of classroom "clickers" to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. , 2008, Nurse education in practice.

[36]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[37]  Lisa A. Best,et al.  The Effectiveness of Library Instruction: Do Student Response Systems (Clickers) Enhance Learning? , 2010 .

[38]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as cognitive tools: Learningwith technology, notfrom technology , 1995, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[39]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .