Sensitivity of the surrogate analysis method to synchronization and conduction velocity of muscular fibers

Abstract This paper shows that conduction velocity (CV) and motor unit action potential (MUAPs) synchronization affects the results of Surrogate Analysis (SA) of the surface electromyography (sEMG) signal. It will be verified if the SA can extract information from the sEMG signal. Also, it is the first time that the SA is interpreted from a physiological point-of-view. To illustrate the relationships between the CV, the synchronization and the SA, a simple dipole-based model for (sEMG) signal simulation is used. It is composed of multiple fibers superposed at the same location, leaving aside any complex geometrical considerations, but putting the emphasis on the timing of the MUAPs firing. Single-pulse synchronization as well as impulse train synchronization are studied. To highlight the difference between spectral (linear) features, nonlinear features and SA relation with the model parameters, the Median Frequency (MDF), the Kurtosis, the Higuchi’s Fractal Dimension (FD) and the FD based SA are compared. The simulation results show that the SA is jointly influenced by CV and the MUAPs synchronization, almost in a multiplicative way. These relations are also more pronounced for an impulse train than for a single pulse. Overall, the SA is shown to be a good feature to consider for CV and MUAPs synchronization estimation. It is moreover uncorrelated with spectral features and moderately with nonlinear features. These findings can be used to 1) help evaluate the CV and MUAPs synchronization and 2) interpret the result of the surrogate analysis.

[1]  Dario Farina,et al.  A surface EMG generation model with multilayer cylindrical description of the volume conductor , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Timmer,et al.  What can Be inferred from surrogate data testing? , 2000, Physical review letters.

[3]  R. Enoka,et al.  Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Farina,et al.  Nonlinear surface EMG analysis to detect changes of motor unit conduction velocity and synchronization. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  J. Y. Kang,et al.  Evaluation of Dysphagia After Cervical Surgery Using Laryngeal Electromyography , 2012, Dysphagia.

[6]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Evaluation of normal swallowing functions by using dynamic high-density surface electromyography maps , 2017, Biomedical engineering online.

[7]  C. Chatfield,et al.  Fourier Analysis of Time Series: An Introduction , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Chang‐Jin Kim,et al.  State-Space Models with Regime-Switching: Classical and Gibbs Sampling Approaches with Applications , 1999 .

[9]  T. Higuchi Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory , 1988 .

[10]  P. Lawrence,et al.  On Modeling the Single Motor Unit Action Potential , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Dimitris Kugiumtzis,et al.  On the Reliability of the surrogate Data Test for nonlinearity in the Analysis of noisy Time Series , 2001, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[12]  Miriam González-Izal,et al.  Electromyographic models to assess muscle fatigue. , 2012, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[13]  S. Puthusserypady,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of EMG signals - a chaotic approach , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  Dario Farina,et al.  Estimation of average muscle fiber conduction velocity from two-dimensional surface EMG recordings , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Power of surrogate data testing with respect to nonstationarity , 1998, chao-dyn/9807039.

[16]  Daniel Massicotte,et al.  Detection of Non Random Phase Signal in Additive Noise with Surrogate Analysis , 2019, ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[17]  G. C. Filligoi,et al.  Influence of high motor unit synchronization levels on non-linear and spectral variables of the surface EMG , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  B. Bigland-ritchie,et al.  Conduction velocity and EMG power spectrum changes in fatigue of sustained maximal efforts. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[19]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[20]  Daniel Massicotte,et al.  Surrogate analysis of fractal dimensions from SEMG sensor array as a predictor of chronic low back pain , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[21]  Dario Farina,et al.  Common Synaptic Input to Motor Neurons, Motor Unit Synchronization, and Force Control , 2015, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[22]  Zhizhong Wang,et al.  Detecting nonlinearity of action surface EMG signal , 2001 .