Macrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis of a multicountry, facility-based, cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND Macrosomia is a risk factor for adverse delivery outcomes. We investigated the prevalence, risk factors, and delivery outcomes of babies with macrosomia in 23 developing countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. METHODS We analysed data from WHO's Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health, which was a facility-based cross-sectional study that obtained data for women giving birth in 373 health facilities in 24 countries in Africa and Latin America in 2004-05, and in Asia in 2007-08. Facilities were selected by stratified multistage cluster sampling and women were recruited at admission for delivery. We extracted data from the medical records with a standardised questionnaire. We used logistic regression with random effects to assess the risk factors for macrosomia and the risks for caesarean section and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes (assessed by a composite score) in babies with the disorder. FINDINGS Of 290,610 deliveries, we analysed data for 276,436 singleton livebirths or fresh stillbirths. Higher maternal age (20-34 years), height, parity, body-mass index, and presence of diabetes, post-term pregnancy, and male fetal sex were associated with a significantly increased risk of macrosomia. Macrosomia was associated with an increased risk of caesarean section because of obstructed labour and post-term pregnancy in all regions. Additionally, macrosomia was associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal birth outcomes in all regions, and of adverse perinatal outcomes only in Africa. INTERPRETATION Increasing prevalence of diabetes and obesity in women of reproductive age in developing countries could be associated with a parallel increase in macrosomic births. The effect and feasibility of control of diabetes and preconception weight on macrosomia should be investigated in these settings. Furthermore, increased institutional delivery in countries where rates are low could be crucial to reduce macrosomia-associated morbidity and mortality. FUNDING None.

[1]  J. Chatfield.  ACOG issues guidelines on fetal macrosomia. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. , 2001, American family physician.

[2]  L. Jovanovič,et al.  The vicious cycle of diabetes and pregnancy , 2007, Current diabetes reports.

[3]  F. McLean,et al.  Fetal Macrosomia: Prediction, Risks, Proposed Management , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  A. Donner,et al.  Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[5]  Dorte M. Jensen,et al.  Maternal obesity and pregnancy , 2012 .

[6]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Secular trends of macrosomia in southeast China, 1994-2005 , 2011, BMC public health.

[7]  J. Konje,et al.  Nutrition and obstructed labor. , 2000, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[8]  G. Alexander,et al.  Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  F. Dunne,et al.  The maternal and fetal impacts of obesity and gestational diabetes on pregnancy outcome. , 2010, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[10]  V. Hall,et al.  Diabetes in Sub Saharan Africa 1999-2011: Epidemiology and public health implications. a systematic review , 2011, BMC public health.

[11]  Taghreed Adam,et al.  Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? , 2005, The Lancet.

[12]  V. Seshiah,et al.  Pregnancy and diabetes scenario around the world: India , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[13]  L. Jovanovič.  Definition, size of the problem, screening and diagnostic criteria: Who should be screened, cost‐effectiveness, and feasibility of screening , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[14]  L. Grummer-Strawn,et al.  Obesity in women from developing countries , 2000, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[15]  E. Sheiner,et al.  Risk factors and perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated with cephalopelvic disproportion: a population-based study , 2012, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[16]  F. Donnay,et al.  Obstetric fistula: the international response , 2004, The Lancet.

[17]  K. Haram,et al.  Suspected big baby: a difficult clinical problem in obstetrics , 2002, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[18]  D. Rouse,et al.  The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. , 1996, JAMA.

[19]  M. Zamorski,et al.  Management of suspected fetal macrosomia. , 2001, American family physician.

[20]  T. Henriksen,et al.  The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[21]  M. Berkus,et al.  The large fetus. , 1999, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[23]  H. Bastian,et al.  Effects of treatment in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles , 2011, The Lancet.

[25]  A. Donner,et al.  Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America , 2006, The Lancet.

[26]  V. Ehrenstein.  Association of Apgar scores with death and neurologic disability , 2009, Clinical epidemiology.

[27]  M. Merialdi,et al.  Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[28]  G. Alexander,et al.  Mode of delivery and birth outcomes of macrosomic infants , 2004, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[29]  G. Roglić.  Diabetes in women: The global perspective , 2009, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.