Rockbursts and mining-induced seismic events have serious socio-economic consequences for the Canadian mining industry, as their mines are extended to greater depths. Automatic multichannel monitoring systems (Electro-Lab MP250s) are routinely, used to detect the arrival times of seismic waves radiated by mining-induced events and sensed on an array of single component transducers installed throughout a mine. These arrival times are then used to locate the events and produce maps of areas of high activity for use in mine planning and design. This approach has limitations in that, it does not allow a detailed analysis of source mechanisms, which could be extracted if whole waveform signals are recorded and analyzed.A major research project, sponsored by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) with the collaboration of the Canadian mining industry, is aimed at enhancing existing mine seismic monitoring technology in Canada, in order to carry out more advanced processing of data to obtain fundamental scientific information on mining-induced seismic events This paper describes preliminary results from seismic monitoring experiments carried out in a hard rock nickel mine in Sudbury, Canada. Existing seismic monitoring instrumentation was enhanced with a low cost microcomputer-based whole waveform seismic acquisition system. Some of the signals recorded during this experiment indicate anisotropic wave propagation through the mine rock masses, as observed by the splitting of shear waves and the relative arrival of two shear waves polarized in directions which may be related to the structural fabric and/or state of stress in the rock mass. Analysis of compressional wave first motion shows the predominance of shear events, as indicated by focal mechanism studies and is confirmed by spectral analysis of the waveforms. The source parameters were estimated fro typical low magnitude localized microseismic events during the initial monitoring experiments. The seismic moment of these events varied between 106 N.m and 2.108 N.m. with a circular source radius of between 1 m and 2 m with an estimated stress drop of the order of 1 MPa.
[1]
Leon Knopoff,et al.
Body Force Equivalents for Seismic Dislocations
,
1964
.
[2]
A. McGarr,et al.
Observations relevant to seismic driving stress, stress drop, and efficiency
,
1979
.
[3]
Shahriar Talebi,et al.
Analysis of the microseismicity induced by a fluid injection in a granitic rock mass
,
1987
.
[4]
D. Hutchins,et al.
Concurrent Seismic Tomographic Imaging And Acoustic Emission Techniques: A New Approach to Rockburst
,
1987
.
[5]
S. M. Spottiswoode,et al.
Source parameters of tremors in a deep-level gold mine
,
1975
.
[6]
Stuart Crampin,et al.
Evaluation of anisotropy by shear‐wave splitting
,
1985
.
[7]
J. Brune.
Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes
,
1970
.
[8]
D. McKenzie.
The relation between fault plane solutions for earthquakes and the directions of the principal stresses
,
1969
.
[9]
Violent deformation of rock near deep-level, tabular excavations—seismic events
,
1971
.
[10]
S. Spottiswoode,et al.
Fracturing And Microseismicity Ahead of a Deep Gold Mine Stope In the Pre-remnant And Remnant Stages of Mining
,
1987
.