Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design

In this article, we present two studies that helped us understand the kinds of support that students need to learn science successfully from design activities. Both were enacted in the context of an approach to learning science from design called learning by design (LBD). In our first study, we designed and integrated a paper-and-pencil scaffolding tool, the design diary, into an LBD unit to support students' design-related activities. We learned two important lessons from the first study. First, we refined our understanding of the processes involved in designing and the ways we might present those processes to students. Second, and more important, we observed that in the dynamic, complex environment of the classroom, not all of the scaffolding could be provided with any one tool or agent. We found that students need multiple forms of support and multiple learning opportunities to learn science successfully from design activities. In our next study, we provided additional support through an organized system of tools and agents. Our analysis of data from the second study leads us to believe that supporting multiple students in a classroom requires us to rethink the notion of scaffolding as it applied to groups of learners in a classroom. We put forth the notion of distributed scaffolding as an approach to supporting hands-on inquiry learning in a classroom. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 42: 185–217, 2005

[1]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[2]  J. Bruner From communication to language—a psychological perspective , 1975, Cognition.

[3]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[4]  H. Sluiter [Learning by doing]. , 1977, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[5]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[6]  J. Wertsch,et al.  The Adult-Child Dyad as a Problem-solving System. , 1980 .

[7]  C SchankRoger,et al.  Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People , 1983 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[9]  H. Barrows How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years , 1985 .

[10]  J. Bruner Actual minds, possible worlds , 1985 .

[11]  J. Wertsch Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind , 1985 .

[12]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension Strategies: A Natural History of One Program for Enhancing Learning. Technical Report No. 334. , 1985 .

[13]  C. Atman,et al.  How people learn. , 1985, Hospital topics.

[14]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  Reading and Writing Instruction: Toward a Theory of Teaching and Learning , 1986 .

[15]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[16]  Ann L. Brown Motivation to learn and understand: On taking charge of one's own learning. , 1988 .

[17]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[19]  R. Gallimore,et al.  Vygotsky and education: Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse , 1990 .

[20]  B. Rogoff Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context , 1990 .

[21]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[22]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Minds In Play: Computer Game Design as a Context for Children''s , 1994 .

[23]  Sharon Derry The Effects of Collaborative Interaction and Computer Tool Use on the Problem-Solving Processes of Lower-Ability Students. , 1993 .

[24]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[25]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[26]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research , 1994 .

[27]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Software-Realized Scaffolding to Facilitate Programming for Science Learning , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[28]  Brian Rowan Comparing Teachers' Work With Work in Other Occupations: Notes on the Professional Status of Teaching , 1994 .

[29]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[30]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning , 1994 .

[31]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[32]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework , 1995 .

[33]  Yoram Reich,et al.  A critical review of General Design Theory , 1995 .

[34]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem Solving , 1995 .

[35]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-based Learning Meets Case-based Reasoning , 1996, ICLS.

[36]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  Explanatory Interface in Interactive Design Environments , 1996 .

[37]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? , 1996 .

[38]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  A Case Study of Problem-Based Learning in a Middle-School Science Class: Lessons Learned , 1996, ICLS.

[39]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Exploring Children's Data Modeling , 1996 .

[40]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding and teacher-student interactions in inquiry learning , 1997, CSCL.

[41]  J. Kolodner Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[42]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing for Understanding: Children's Lung Models , 1997 .

[43]  Kristine Nagel,et al.  Intra-group and intergroup: an exploration of learning with complementary collaboration tools , 1997, CSCL.

[44]  Laura R. Roehler,et al.  Scaffolding: A powerful tool in social constructivist classrooms. , 1997 .

[45]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  A Scaffolded Learning Environment Supporting Learning and Design Activities , 1997 .

[46]  C. Stone,et al.  Should We Salvage the Scaffolding Metaphor? , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[47]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Keeping the Metaphor of Scaffolding Fresh—-A Response to C. Addison Stone's “The Metaphor of Scaffolding , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[48]  C. Stone The Metaphor of Scaffolding , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[49]  D. Reid,et al.  Scaffolding: a broader view. , 1998, Journal of learning disabilities.

[50]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Strategies for supporting student inquiry in design tasks , 1998 .

[51]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Learning by Design from Theory to Practice , 1998 .

[52]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments , 1996, CHI.

[53]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[54]  Rosemary Luckin Knowledge construction in the zone of collaboration: scaffolding the learner to productive interactivity , 1998 .

[55]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory , 1999 .

[56]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional design , 1999 .

[57]  Julie E. Wollman-Bonilla,et al.  Teacher and Peer Roles in Scaffolding First Graders' Responses to Literature. , 1999 .

[58]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[59]  Philip Bell,et al.  Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students' Reflection and Argumentation Using a Cognitive Software Guide , 2000 .

[60]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Scaffolding the Development of an Inquiry-Based (Science) Classroom , 2000 .

[61]  E. Davis Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts , 2003 .

[62]  Sadhana Puntambekar,et al.  Distributed Scaffolding: Helping Students Learn in a ‘Learning by Design’ Environment , 2003 .