Long range interactions between object-motion and self-motion in the perception of movement in depth

Self-motion through a three-dimensional array of objects creates a radial flow pattern on the retina. We superimposed a simulated object moving in depth on such a flow pattern to investigate the effect of the flow pattern on judgments of both the time to collision (TTC) with an approaching object and the trajectory of that object. Our procedure allowed us to decouple the direction and speed of simulated self motion-in-depth (MID) from the direction and speed of simulated object MID. In Experiment 1 we found that objects with the same closing speed were perceived to have a higher closing speed when self-motion and object-motion were in the same direction and a lower closing speed when they were in the opposite direction. This effect saturated rapidly as the ratio between the speeds of self-motion and object-motion was increased. In Experiment 2 we found that the perceived direction of object-MID was shifted towards the focus of expansion of the flow pattern. In Experiments 3 and 4 we found that the erroneous biases in perceived speed and direction produced by simulated self-motion were significantly reduced when binocular information about MID was added. These findings suggest that the large body of research that has studied motion perception using stationary observers has limited applicability to situations in which both the observer and the object are moving.

[1]  B. J. Frost,et al.  The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds , 1990, Vision Research.

[2]  E. Wist,et al.  Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation , 1975 .

[3]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception , 1973, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  D. Regan,et al.  Necessary conditions for the perception of motion in depth. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  D Regan.  Spatial orientation in aviation: visual contributions. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[7]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[8]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving Heading in the Presence of Moving Objects , 1995, Perception.

[9]  D Regan,et al.  Discrimination of the direction and speed of motion in depth of a monocularly visible target from binocular information alone. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Evidence for the existence of neural mechanisms selectively sensitive to the direction of movement in space , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular correlates of the direction of motion in depth , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  D Regan,et al.  How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving? , 1982, Science.

[13]  J. Gaddum.  Probit Analysis , 1948, Nature.

[14]  G. J. K. Alderson,et al.  An operational analysis of a one-handed catching task using high speed photography. , 1974, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  D Regan,et al.  Visual responses to changing size and to sideways motion for different directions of motion in depth: linearization of visual responses. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  P. L. Scilley,et al.  Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Human heading judgments and object-based motion information , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  David Regan,et al.  Visual Processing of the Motion of an Object in Three Dimensions for a Stationary or a Moving Observer , 1995, Perception.

[19]  D Regan,et al.  The relation between discrimination and sensitivity in the perception of motion in depth. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  D. Regan,et al.  Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Predictive information and the control of action: What you see is what you get. , 1991 .

[22]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[23]  T. Brandt,et al.  Object-motion detection affected by concurrent self-motion perception: Psychophysics of a new phenomenon , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[24]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[25]  Peter P. Guerrera.  Keep Your Eye on the Ball , 1999 .

[26]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[27]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[28]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[29]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Li Li,et al.  Perception of heading during rotation: sufficiency of dense motion parallax and reference objects , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  R Gray,et al.  Exploring the Link between Time to Collision and Representational Momentum , 2001, Perception.

[32]  D Regan,et al.  Motion in depth: Adequate and inadequate simulation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  D Regan,et al.  Some dynamic features of depth perception. , 1973, Vision research.

[34]  D Regan,et al.  Binocular information about time to collision and time to passage , 2002, Vision Research.

[35]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  田中 啓治.  Analysis of Local and Wide-Field Movements in the Superior Temporal Visual Areas of the Macaque Monkey , 1987 .

[37]  John P. Wann,et al.  Anticipating arrival: is the tau margin a specious theory? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  D. Regan,et al.  Monocular discrimination of the direction of motion in depth , 1994, Vision Research.

[39]  D. Regan,et al.  Simulated self-motion alters perceived time to collision , 2000, Current Biology.

[40]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[41]  D. Regan,et al.  Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object , 2000, Vision Research.

[42]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[43]  Thomas Szirte,et al.  Applied dimensional analysis and modeling , 1997 .

[44]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[45]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[46]  C. Duffy.  MST neurons respond to optic flow and translational movement. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  W Lang,et al.  Cortical responses to object-motion and visually-induced self-motion perception. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.