Factors Affecting Information Technology Usage: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature

With an estimated investment of over 1 trillion dollars to date on information technology (IT) products and applications, one would hope that there exists a corresponding improvement in organizational performance and productivity. The level of IT usage has widely been accepted as an important indicator of IT success within organizations. This research synthesizes and validates the construct of IT usage using a meta-analysis. It accomplishes that by analyzing the empirical results of various studies over a period of time covering a broad scope of characteristics of both users and information systems (IS), and it examines the relation between these characteristics and the level of IT usage within organizations. In general, the results of this meta-analysis lead to the conclusion that there exists a strong and significant positive relation between the perception of ease of use and the perceived usefulness of an IT system to the actual amount of usage. Another factor that indicates a high level of IT usage is the organizational support of IT within an enterprise. Although the factors of education level, training level, and professional level were found to have a substantial effect on IT usage, the magnitude of these effects were lower than those of the perceptions of the user and organizational support. Managers and IT professionals may have a better chance of avoiding IT system ineffectiveness and even failure by paying attention to the results of this research, especially in view of the fact that it synthesized and validated the results of a significant number of empirical studies published in some of the best IS journals. Rarely do single research experiments provide definitive answers on which to base policy decisions.

[1]  Richard F. Beltramini,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis , 1987 .

[2]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Towards a theory of strategic use of information resources: An inductive approach , 1991, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Information Technology for Management , 1995 .

[4]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[5]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  Using knowledge-based systems for strategic market assessment , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[6]  John Tillquist,et al.  Participation on Electronic Bulletin Board Systems: An Empirical Analysis of Work Value Congruency , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An examination of end-user types , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[8]  D DavisFred Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , 1989 .

[9]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[10]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[11]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Microcomputer adoption - The impact of organizational size and structure , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Cynthia M. Jackson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System , 1997 .

[13]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model* , 1991 .

[14]  A. Sockloff,et al.  Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences: (revised edition), by Jacob Cohen. New York: Academic Press, 1977, xv + 474 pp., $24.50. , 1978 .

[15]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[16]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[18]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for MIS scholars , 1997, CACM.

[20]  W. Beyer CRC Standard Probability And Statistics Tables and Formulae , 1990 .

[21]  Magid Igbaria An examination of microcomputer usage in Taiwan , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Maarten Gelderman,et al.  The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Rachid M. Zeffane,et al.  Patterns of structural control in high and low computer user organizations , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[25]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Is Attitudes: toward Theoretical and Definition Clarity , 1986, ICIS.

[26]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[27]  Charles R. Schwenk Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[28]  Christine T. Kydd,et al.  Managerial use of video conferencing , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[30]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Nava Pliskin,et al.  Diffusion of E-mail: An organisational learning perspective , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Denis M. S. Lee Usage Patterns and Sources of Assistance for Personal Computer Users , 1986, MIS Q..

[33]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers. , 1956 .

[34]  Marian M. Extejt,et al.  Trends in computer use in collective bargaining , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[37]  Varun Grover,et al.  An examination of DBMS adoption and success in American organizations , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[39]  William R. King,et al.  Determinants of the effectiveness of personal decision support systems , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[40]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[41]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[42]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Determining information system usage: Some issues and examples , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[43]  John A. Lehman,et al.  Business graphics trends, two years later , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[44]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[45]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Anol Bhattacherjee Managerial Influences on Intraorganizational Information Technology Use: A Principal-Agent Model , 1998 .

[47]  Akhilesh Bajaj,et al.  A feedback model to understand information system usage , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Thomas W. Ferratt,et al.  Information technology use by managers in Greece to support decision making: Amount, perceived value, and satisfaction , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[49]  William R. King,et al.  Facilitators and inhibitors for the strategic use of information technology , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[50]  Oya Culpan,et al.  Attitudes of end-users towards information technology in manufacturing and service industries , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[51]  Mohammad M. Amini,et al.  Supercomputing in corporate America: A sample survey , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[52]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[53]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[54]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[55]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  The use of spreadsheets in organizations: Determinants and consequences , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[56]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  A study of personal computer utilization by managers , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[57]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User Information Systems Acceptance, Training, and Effectiveness , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[60]  Kim Merchant,et al.  Expert systems: A survey of their use in UK business , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[61]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[62]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[63]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[64]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[65]  James N. Morgan,et al.  Chargeback and maturity of IS use , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[66]  B. Green,et al.  Quantitative methods for literature reviews. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.