Efficacy Assessment of the High-Frequency High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound as a New Treatment for Actinic Keratosis

Background: Actinic keratosis (AK) is the most common precancerous cutaneous lesion, with risk of progression to cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In the current study, we evaluated the efficacy of 20-MHz high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), as a new treatment modality for AK. Materials and Methods: Patients with AK lesions (grades I–III) treated with HIFU were included in the study. The clinical assessment was performed 3 months after therapy. Results: Twenty-one patients (14 men, 7 women) with 108 AK lesions (grades I–III) were included in the current study. Ages ranged from 62 to 85 years (mean 72.6 years). Clinically complete resolution of the actinic damage in the treated area was detected in 72.2% of lesions. Furthermore, 28 lesions (26%) showed a reduction of the AK grade, or partial response, after the therapy. Most of the patients experienced annoying but short pain during the procedure. However, late adverse effects of the therapy, such as hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation and erythema were reported only in a small portion of the lesions. Conclusions: 20-MHz HIFU could be an effective and safe alternative treatment for AK.

[1]  T. Zawada,et al.  High‐frequency (20 MHz) high‐intensity focused ultrasound: New Treatment of actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, and Kaposi sarcoma. An open‐label exploratory study , 2020, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[2]  A. Firooz,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for face and neck rejuvenation , 2020, Lasers in Medical Science.

[3]  T. Zawada,et al.  High‐frequency (20 MHz) high‐intensity focused ultrasound system for dermal intervention: A 12‐week local tolerance study in minipigs , 2020, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[4]  T. Zawada,et al.  High‐frequency (20‐MHz) high‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) system for dermal intervention: Preclinical evaluation in skin equivalents , 2019, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[5]  Raj Persad,et al.  A Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes Following Focal Therapy in Treating Clinically Significant Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer , 2018, European urology.

[6]  E. Stockfleth The importance of treating the field in actinic keratosis , 2017, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[7]  Afshin Gangi,et al.  Minimally invasive treatments of painful bone lesions: state of the art , 2017, Medical Oncology.

[8]  J. McGregor,et al.  British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the care of patients with actinic keratosis 2017 , 2017, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  S. M. Seyed Jafari,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy efficacy assessment of daylight photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis patients , 2016, The British journal of dermatology.

[10]  R. Braun,et al.  Swiss clinical practice guidelines on field cancerization of the skin. , 2014, Swiss medical weekly.

[11]  A. Armstrong,et al.  Efficacy of photodynamic therapy vs other interventions in randomized clinical trials for the treatment of actinic keratoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, JAMA dermatology.

[12]  M. Paquet,et al.  Network meta‐analysis of the outcome ‘participant complete clearance’ in nonimmunosuppressed participants of eight interventions for actinic keratosis: a follow‐up on a Cochrane review , 2013, The British journal of dermatology.

[13]  R. Ceilley,et al.  Current issues in the management of actinic keratosis. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  Aditya K. Gupta,et al.  Interventions for actinic keratoses. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  S. Amini,et al.  What is the role of field-directed therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis? Part 1: overview and investigational topical agents. , 2012, Cutis.

[16]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Follow‐up of actinic keratoses after shave biopsy by in‐vivo reflectance confocal microscopy – a pilot study , 2010, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[17]  P. G. Barthe,et al.  Clinical pilot study of intense ultrasound therapy to deep dermal facial skin and subcutaneous tissues. , 2007, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[18]  R. Anderson,et al.  Confocal laser microscopic imaging of actinic keratoses in vivo: a preliminary report. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[19]  C. Cockerell,et al.  Actinic Keratoses , 1997 .

[20]  J. Callen,et al.  A double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluating masoprocol cream in the treatment of actinic keratoses on the head and neck. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.