Finite element modelling and model updating of small scale composite propellers

The application of composite materials in marine propellers is a relatively recent innovation. Methods have been presented to analyse the hydro-elastic behaviour of these type of propellers and in some studies these methods have been validated as well. Differences between measured and predicted responses are typically explained from inaccuracies in structural or fluid modelling. It is beyond all doubt that for an accurate finite element (FE) model a correct modelling of the fibre orientations and material properties is required. Both subjects are addressed in this work. An approach is presented in order to accurately define the element dependent fibre orientations in doubly curved geometries like (marine) propeller blades. In order to improve the structural response prediction this paper presents an inverse method based on experimental and numerical results which can be used for structural identification and FE model updating. In the developed approach the residual between measurement results obtained with static experiments and results obtained with an FE model is minimized by adapting the stiffness properties in the FE calculation. This method has been successfully applied to two small scale composite propellers. The obtained material properties have been determined with a relatively high confidence level. A verification by means of measured and calculated eigenfrequencies show also that accurate results are obtained with the inverse method. Therefore, this paper gives a positive answer on the research question whether it is possible to determine the stiffness properties of small scale composite marine propeller blades from a static experimental data.

[1]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[2]  R. H. W. ten,et al.  Finite element simulations of laminated composite forming processes , 2007 .

[4]  Yin Lu Young,et al.  Time-dependent hydroelastic analysis of cavitating propulsors , 2007 .

[5]  W. P. De Wilde,et al.  Mixed Numerical-experimental Techniques: Past, Present and Future , 2002 .

[6]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Model Updating In Structural Dynamics: A Survey , 1993 .

[7]  S. Hwang,et al.  Determination of elastic constants of materials by vibration testing , 2000 .

[8]  Hugo Sol,et al.  Mixed numerical–experimental technique for orthotropic parameter identification using biaxial tensile tests on cruciform specimens , 2007 .

[9]  W. P. De Wilde,et al.  A mixed numerical/experimental technique for the nondestructive identification of the stiffness properties of fibre reinforced composite materials , 1997 .

[10]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian model updating for structural identification , 2015 .

[11]  Muthu Govindaraj,et al.  A Physically Based Model of Fabric Drape Using Flexible Shell Theory , 1995 .

[12]  F. N. Catbas,et al.  A Review of Model Updating Methods for Civil Infrastructure Systems , 2015 .

[13]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[14]  José Pedro Albergaria Amaral Blasques,et al.  Hydro-elastic analysis and optimization of a composite marine propeller , 2010 .

[15]  An Willems,et al.  Forming Simulation of Textile Reinforced Composite Shell Structures (Vormgevingssimulatie van textielversterkte composiet schaalproducten) , 2008 .

[16]  Bart Peeters,et al.  Updating Finite Element Model of a Wind Turbine Blade Section Using Experimental Modal Analysis Results , 2014 .

[17]  Remko Akkerman,et al.  Finite Element Simulations of Laminated Composites Forming Processes , 2010 .

[18]  Saeed. Ziaei Rad,et al.  Methods of updating numerical models in structural dynamics. , 1997 .

[19]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  Modelling complex geometry using solid finite element meshes with correct composite material orientations , 2010 .