Supporting Living Lab with Life Cycle and Tools for Smart City Environments (S)

Smart Cities are becoming proactive environments in which municipalities are engaging stakeholders in contributing and participating to the life of the smart city and to the development and updating of the smart solutions in the infrastructure. To this end, the methodologies and tools for Smart City Living Lab start up, management and life cycling are becoming relevant. In this document, the solution developed for Snap4City project is described. Snap4City has been developed on the basis of Km4City tools for supporting Living Lab in response to the competitive call of Select4Cities European commission project directed by three major cities in Europe: Helsinki, Antwerp and Copenhagen. The proposed Snap4City solution includes a IOT/IOE development model, a life cycle and a set of tools for data collection, data sharing, processes and analytics development, collection and management, and sharing. The paper also reports the experience of using these tools. Keywords— Smart City, Living Lab, Open Data, Collaborative Systems, Co-Creation Activities

[1]  Krassimira Paskaleva,et al.  Stakeholder engagement in the smart city : making living labs work , 2015 .

[2]  Victor M. Larios-Rosillo,et al.  Synergy between smart cities' hackathons and living labs as a vehicle for accelerating tangible innovations on cities , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[3]  Pierfrancesco Bellini,et al.  Rights enforcement and licensing understanding for RDF stores aggregating open and private data sets , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[4]  Pierfrancesco Bellini,et al.  Km4City ontology building vs data harvesting and cleaning for smart-city services , 2014, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[5]  Hanifa Shah,et al.  Living Labs (LILA): An Innovative Paradigm for Community Development—Project of “XploR” Cane for the Blind , 2017 .

[6]  Giorgia Nesti,et al.  Living Labs: A New Tool for Co-production? , 2015 .

[7]  Ferdinando Trapani,et al.  For a “Living (Lab)” Approach to Smart Cities , 2017 .

[8]  Serena Villata,et al.  An Access Control Model for Linked Data , 2011, OTM Workshops.

[9]  Grazia Concilio,et al.  Urban Living Labs: Opportunities in and for Planning , 2016 .

[10]  Pierfrancesco Bellini,et al.  Analysis and assessment of a knowledge based smart city architecture providing service APIs , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[11]  Suhardi,et al.  Privacy challenges in the application of smart city in Indonesia , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI).

[12]  Pierfrancesco Bellini,et al.  IPR Centered Institutional Service and Tools for Content and Metadata Management , 2015, Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng..

[13]  Joerg Swetina,et al.  Toward a standardized common M2M service layer platform: Introduction to oneM2M , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[14]  Pierfrancesco Bellini,et al.  Km4City Smart City API: An Integrated Support for Mobility Services , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP).

[15]  Grazia Concilio,et al.  Co-Creative, Re-Generative Smart Cities. Smart Cities and Planning in a Living Lab Perspective 2 , 2014 .

[16]  Fuchun Joseph Lin,et al.  A Feasibility Study on Developing IoT/M2M Applications over ETSI M2M Architecture , 2013, ICPADS 2013.

[17]  Theo Tryfonas,et al.  Living Labs, Innovation Districts and Information Marketplaces: A Systems Approach for Smart Cities , 2013, CSER.

[18]  Pierfrancesco Bellini,et al.  Linked open graph: Browsing multiple SPARQL entry points to build your own LOD views , 2014, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..