BOP2: Bayesian optimal design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complex endpoints

We propose a flexible Bayesian optimal phase II (BOP2) design that is capable of handling simple (e.g., binary) and complicated (e.g., ordinal, nested, and co-primary) endpoints under a unified framework. We use a Dirichlet-multinomial model to accommodate different types of endpoints. At each interim, the go/no-go decision is made by evaluating a set of posterior probabilities of the events of interest, which is optimized to maximize power or minimize the number of patients under the null hypothesis. Unlike other existing Bayesian designs, the BOP2 design explicitly controls the type I error rate, thereby bridging the gap between Bayesian designs and frequentist designs. In addition, the stopping boundary of the BOP2 design can be enumerated prior to the onset of the trial. These features make the BOP2 design accessible to a wide range of users and regulatory agencies and particularly easy to implement in practice. Simulation studies show that the BOP2 design has favorable operating characteristics with higher power and lower risk of incorrectly terminating the trial than some existing Bayesian phase II designs. The software to implement the BOP2 design is freely available at www.trialdesign.org. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Sacchi,et al.  Safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with rituximab in recurrent indolent non-follicular lymphoma: final results of a phase II study conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi , 2016, Haematologica.

[2]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  An improved method for deriving optimal one-sided group sequential tests , 1992 .

[4]  Ying Yuan,et al.  Bayesian Designs for Phase I-II Clinical Trials , 2016 .

[5]  P. Thall,et al.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  T. Chen,et al.  Optimal three-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  H. Sung,et al.  A New Statistical Method for Dose-Finding Based on Efficacy and Toxicity in Early Phase Clinical Trials , 2004, Investigational New Drugs.

[8]  P F Thall,et al.  Some extensions and applications of a Bayesian strategy for monitoring multiple outcomes in clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  B W Turnbull,et al.  Group sequential tests for bivariate response: interim analyses of clinical trials with both efficacy and safety endpoints. , 1993, Biometrics.

[10]  J Jack Lee,et al.  A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials , 2008, Clinical trials.

[11]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[12]  T. Werner,et al.  A phase II trial of trebananib (AMG 386; IND#111071), a selective angiopoietin 1/2 neutralizing peptibody, in patients with persistent/recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium: An NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group trial. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[14]  P F Thall,et al.  Recent developments in the design of phase II clinical trials. , 1995, Cancer treatment and research.

[15]  David Machin,et al.  Bayesian two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  P F Thall,et al.  An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  T R Fleming,et al.  One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. , 1982, Biometrics.

[18]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Bayesian interim analysis of phase II cancer clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Ying Yuan,et al.  A Bayesian design for phase II clinical trials with delayed responses based on multiple imputation , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  P F Thall,et al.  Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. , 1994, Biometrics.