Pricing Electronic Mail to Solve the Problem of Spam

Junk e-mail or spam is rapidly choking off e-mail as a reliable and efficient means of communication over the Internet. Although the demand for human attention increases rapidly with the volume of information and communication, the supply of attention hardly changes. Markets are a social institution for efficiently allocating supply and demand of scarce resources. Charging a price for sending messages may help discipline senders from demanding more attention than they are willing to pay for. Price may also credibly inform recipients about the value of a message to the sender before they read it. This article examines economic approaches to the problem of spam and the results of two laboratory experiments to explore the consequences of a pricing system for electronic mail. Charging postage for e-mail causes senders to be more selective and to send fewer messages. However, recipients did not interpret the postage paid by senders as a signal of the importance of the messages. These results suggest that markets for attention have the potential for addressing the problem of spam but their design needs further development and testing.

[1]  Timothy Van Zandt,et al.  Information Overload in a Network of Targeted Communication , 2001 .

[2]  Karim Jamal,et al.  Enforced Standards Versus Evolution by General Acceptance: A Comparative Study of E-Commerce Privacy Disclosure and Practice in the U.S. And the U.K. , 2003 .

[3]  Moni Naor,et al.  On Memory-Bound Functions for Fighting Spam , 2003, CRYPTO.

[4]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study , 2003, CHI '03.

[5]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models of attention in computing and communication , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[6]  Olle Bälter,et al.  Bifrost inbox organizer: giving users control over the inbox , 2002, NordiCHI '02.

[7]  Karim Jamal,et al.  Privacy in E-Commerce: Development of Reporting Standards, Disclosure and Assurance Services in an Unregulated Market , 2002 .

[8]  James Morris,et al.  Markets for attention: will postage for email help? , 2002, CSCW '02.

[9]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Attention-Sensitive Alerting , 1999, UAI.

[10]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail , 1998, AAAI 1998.

[11]  L. Perlow The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[12]  Moni Naor,et al.  Pricing via Processing or Combatting Junk Mail , 1992, CRYPTO.

[13]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[14]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Diversity in the use of electronic mail: a preliminary inquiry , 1988, TOIS.

[15]  Stephen Pollock,et al.  A rule-based message filtering system , 1988, TOIS.

[16]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Intelligent Information Sharing Systems , 1986 .

[17]  Ramana Rao,et al.  Semi-structured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination , 1986, CSCW '86.

[18]  I. Pool,et al.  The Social Impact of the Telephone , 1978 .

[19]  M. Spence Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[20]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Media Use in a Global Corporation: Electronic Mail and Organizational Knowledge , 2003 .

[21]  Scott E. Fahlman,et al.  Selling interrupt rights: A way to control unwanted e-mail and telephone calls , 2002, IBM Syst. J..

[22]  Adam Back,et al.  Hashcash - A Denial of Service Counter-Measure , 2002 .