A Framework for Determining Commuter Preference Along a Proposed Bus Rapid Transit Corridor

Abstract Study of commuters ‘attitude towards public transport and their perceptions of existing service quality for different service attributes of public transport have gained immense importance in recent years for determining appropriate public transport service levels so as to retain the loyalty of existing users and for attracting potential users. Commuters ‘perception of service quality varies for different service delivery environments due to different urban settings, i.e., land use and traffic system, location and route characteristics, level of accessibility, fare structure, past experiences from service providers and their assessment of what is possible to be delivered. While, Level-of-Service (LOS) is a general measure to determine good, poor and acceptable service levels for various service attributes of public transport based on user perception, there is a further need to determine the minimum and maximum tolerance level of users i.e., the zone of tolerance (ZOT) and the percentage of users satisfied at different service levels which is defined here as ‘user satisfaction level (USL)’ for different service attributes at the route or corridor level to determine commuters’ needs and preferences for that particular route/corridor which may differ significantly from other routes/corridors within the city. In addition, to ZOT and USL, it is also equally important to identify the critical service areas which need immediate improvement based on commuter preference. The present research proposes a framework to determine commuter preference for different service attributes of existing bus routes along a major corridor which could help in designing service levels for a proposed bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor.

[1]  M. V. Lamar,et al.  Marketing in Public Transportation: a neural network approach , 2001 .

[2]  Hiroyuki Iseki,et al.  Style versus Service? An Analysis of User Perceptions of Transit Stops and Stations in Los Angeles , 2010 .

[3]  Antonio Lobo,et al.  Zone of Tolerance as an Effective Management Tool to Assess Service Quality in Singapore's Stockbroking Industry , 2008 .

[4]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service , 1993 .

[5]  L. V. Jones,et al.  The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. , 1970 .

[6]  Mark Brussel,et al.  Modeling commuter preferences for the proposed bus rapid transit in Dar-es-Salaam , 2012 .

[7]  Luigi dell’Olio,et al.  The quality of service desired by public transport users , 2011 .

[8]  Tor W. Andreassen,et al.  (Dis)satisfaction with public services: the case of public transportation , 1995 .

[9]  Alexandre G. de Barros,et al.  Overall level of service measures for airport passenger terminals , 2008 .

[10]  Ching-Fu Chen,et al.  Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers--The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement , 2011 .

[11]  Debapratim Pandit,et al.  Importance of user perception in evaluating level of service for bus transit for a developing country like India: a review , 2013 .

[12]  Laura Eboli,et al.  A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passenger’s point of view , 2011 .

[13]  Constantinos Antoniou,et al.  Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications , 2008 .

[14]  John A. Martilla,et al.  Importance-Performance Analysis , 1977 .

[15]  Gabriela Beirão,et al.  Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study , 2007 .