Micro-ultrasonic cleaving of cell clusters by laser-generated focused ultrasound and its mechanisms.

Laser-generated focused ultrasound (LGFU) is a unique modality that can produce single-pulsed cavitation and strong local disturbances on a tight focal spot (<100 μm). We utilize LGFU as a non-contact, non-thermal, high-precision tool to fractionate and cleave cell clusters cultured on glass substrates. Fractionation processes are investigated in detail, which confirms distinct cell behaviors in the focal center and the periphery of LGFU spot. For better understanding of local disturbances under LGFU, we use a high-speed laser-flash shadowgraphy technique and then fully visualize instantaneous microscopic processes from the ultrasound wave focusing to the micro-bubble collapse. Based on these visual evidences, we discuss possible mechanisms responsible for the focal and peripheral disruptions, such as a liquid jet-induced wall shear stress and shock emissions due to bubble collapse. The ultrasonic micro-fractionation is readily available for in vitro cell patterning and harvesting. Moreover, it is significant as a preliminary step towards high-precision surgery applications in future.

[1]  Vasan Venugopalan,et al.  Pulsed laser microbeam-induced cell lysis: time-resolved imaging and analysis of hydrodynamic effects. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[2]  C. Lafon,et al.  Blood clot disruption in vitro using shockwaves delivered by an extracorporeal generator after pre-exposure to lytic agent. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  L. Guo,et al.  Localized micro‐scale disruption of cells using laser‐generated focused ultrasound , 2013, Journal of biophotonics.

[4]  Taehwa Lee,et al.  Effect of liquid environment on laser-induced backside wet etching of fused silica , 2010 .

[5]  C. Ohl,et al.  Detachment and sonoporation of adherent HeLa-cells by shock wave-induced cavitation. , 2003, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[7]  A. van den Berg,et al.  Controlled cavitation–cell interaction: trans-membrane transport and viability studies , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  J. Kennedy High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[9]  Tao Ling,et al.  Carbon nanotube composite optoacoustic transmitters for strong and high frequency ultrasound generation. , 2010, Applied physics letters.

[10]  A. Maxwell Noninvasive Thrombolysis Using Histotripsy Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy. , 2012 .

[11]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Shock wave technology and application: an update. , 2011, European urology.

[12]  T. Dubinsky,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound: current potential and oncologic applications. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Yufeng Zhou,et al.  High intensity focused ultrasound in clinical tumor ablation. , 2011, World journal of clinical oncology.

[14]  Z. Xu,et al.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[15]  Constantin Coussios,et al.  High intensity focused ultrasound: Physical principles and devices , 2007, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[16]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Carbon-Nanotube Optoacoustic Lens for Focused Ultrasound Generation and High-Precision Targeted Therapy , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[17]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Cell detachment method using shock-wave-induced cavitation. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Applications of Acoustics and Cavitation to Noninvasive Therapy and Drug Delivery , 2008 .

[20]  Claus-Dieter Ohl,et al.  Controlled cavitation in microfluidic systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[21]  Sébastien Balibar,et al.  Cavitation pressure in water. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  James A. McAteer,et al.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique , 2009, Nature Reviews Urology.

[23]  T. D. Mast Empirical relationships between acoustic parameters in human soft tissues , 2000 .

[24]  C. Cain,et al.  Disintegration of tissue using high intensity focused ultrasound: Two approaches that utilize shock waves , 2012 .