RETRACTED: A Common Discrete Resource for Visual Working Memory and Visual Search

The following article has been retracted by the Editor and publishers of Psychological Science: Anderson, D. E., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2013). A common discrete resource for visual working memory and visual search. Psychological Science, 24, 929–938. doi:10.1177/0956797612464380

[1]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  E. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Individual Differences in Selecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Edward Awh,et al.  Selection and storage of perceptual groups is constrained by a discrete resource in working memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[5]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[6]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[7]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  E. Vogel,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for a Postperceptual Locus of Suppression during the Attentional Blink Time-based Attention and the Attentional Blink , 1998 .

[10]  Stephen M. Emrich,et al.  Visual Search Elicits the Electrophysiological Marker of Visual Working Memory , 2009, PloS one.

[11]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[12]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[13]  Veronica Mazza,et al.  Individuation of multiple targets during visual enumeration: New insights from electrophysiology , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  R. Engle,et al.  Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention". , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  J. Wolfe.  Guidance of Visual Search by Preattentive Information , 2005 .

[17]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[18]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  R. Engle.  Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[20]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[21]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[22]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Multiple Spatially Overlapping Sets Can Be Enumerated in Parallel , 2006, Psychological science.

[23]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Search has Memory , 2001, Psychological science.

[25]  G. Logan,et al.  On the Use of a Concurrent Memory Load to Measure Attention and Automaticity , 1979 .

[26]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[27]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  D L Fisher,et al.  Limited-channel models of automatic detection: capacity and scanning in visual search. , 1982, Psychological review.

[31]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[32]  M. Kane,et al.  Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: The influences of sustained and selective attention , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[34]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[35]  Edward Awh,et al.  Precision in Visual Working Memory Reaches a Stable Plateau When Individual Item Limits Are Exceeded , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  R. Engle,et al.  The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[37]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  N. Cowan.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[40]  Matthew P. Gerrie,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search: The roles of top-down and bottom-up processing , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Neural Measures Reveal a Fixed Item Limit in Subitizing , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  E. Vogel,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE How to Exploit Diversity for Scientific Gain Using Individual Differences to Constrain Cognitive Theory , 2022 .

[44]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Maintaining Representations in Visual Working Memory , 2007, Cortex.

[45]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[47]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[48]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  How Much Memory Does Oculomotor Search Have? , 2003, Psychological science.

[49]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Attention in Character-Classification Tasks : Evidence for the Automaticity of Component Stages , 1978 .