Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex

Recognizing objects in cluttered scenes requires attentional mechanisms to filter out distracting information. Previous studies have found several physiological correlates of attention in visual cortex, including larger responses for attended objects. However, it has been unclear whether these attention-related changes have a large impact on information about objects at the neural population level. To address this question, we trained monkeys to covertly deploy their visual attention from a central fixation point to one of three objects displayed in the periphery, and we decoded information about the identity and position of the objects from populations of ∼200 neurons from the inferior temporal cortex using a pattern classifier. The results show that before attention was deployed, information about the identity and position of each object was greatly reduced relative to when these objects were shown in isolation. However, when a monkey attended to an object, the pattern of neural activity, represented as a vector with dimensionality equal to the size of the neural population, was restored toward the vector representing the isolated object. Despite this nearly exclusive representation of the attended object, an increase in the salience of nonattended objects caused “bottom-up” mechanisms to override these “top-down” attentional enhancements. The method described here can be used to assess which attention-related physiological changes are directly related to object recognition, and should be helpful in assessing the role of additional physiological changes in the future.

[1]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Differential Attention-Dependent Response Modulation across Cell Classes in Macaque Visual Area V4 , 2007, Neuron.

[2]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[3]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of task difficulty and target likelihood in area V4 of macaque monkeys. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Michael W. Spratling Predictive coding as a model of biased competition in visual attention , 2008, Vision Research.

[5]  E. Rolls,et al.  A Neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition , 2004, Vision Research.

[6]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  An Integrated Microcircuit Model of Attentional Processing in the Neocortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[8]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Dynamic population coding of category information in inferior temporal and prefrontal cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  F. Hamker The reentry hypothesis: the putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  David D. Cox,et al.  What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant" object recognition? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.

[14]  Joonyeol Lee,et al.  A Normalization Model of Attentional Modulation of Single Unit Responses , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Impaired filtering of distracter stimuli by TE neurons following V4 and TEO lesions in macaques. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2005, Science.

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Jorge V. José,et al.  Inhibitory synchrony as a mechanism for attentional gain modulation , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[19]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[21]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Gross,et al.  Neural ensemble coding in inferior temporal cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  S. Epstein,et al.  Gamma oscillations mediate stimulus competition and attentional selection in a cortical network model , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  B. C. Motter Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[27]  T. Poggio,et al.  What and where: A Bayesian inference theory of attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[28]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Computational processes in human vision : an interdisciplinary perspective , 1988 .

[29]  R. Desimone,et al.  Modulation of Oscillatory Neuronal Synchronization by Selective Visual Attention , 2001, Science.

[30]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Spatial Attention Decorrelates Intrinsic Activity Fluctuations in Macaque Area V4 , 2009, Neuron.