Factors governing the form of the relation between muscle force and the EMG: a simulation study.

The dependence of the form of the EMG-force relation on key motoneuron and muscle properties was explored using a simulation approach. Surface EMG signals and isometric forces were simulated using existing motoneuron pool, muscle force, and surface EMG models, based primarily on reported properties of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle in humans. Our simulation results indicate that the relation between electrical and mechanical properties of the individual motor unit level plays the dominant role in determining the overall EMG amplitude-force relation of the muscle, while the underlying motor unit firing rate strategy appears to be a less important factor. However, different motor unit firing rate strategies result in substantially different relations between counts of the numbers of motoneuron discharges and the isometric force. Our simulation results also show that EMG amplitude (estimated as the average rectified value) increases as a result of synchronous discharges of different motor units within the pool, but the magnitude of this increase is determined primarily by the action potential duration of the synchronized motor units. Furthermore, when the EMG effects are normalized to their maximum levels, motor unit synchrony does not exert significant effects on the form of the EMG-force relation, provided that the synchrony level is held similar at different excitation levels.

[1]  P. Rack,et al.  The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Basmajian Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .

[4]  Gabriella Olmo,et al.  Analysis of EMG signals by means of the matched wavelet transform , 1997 .

[5]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Myoelectric signal versus force relationship in different human muscles. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[6]  J. Stephens,et al.  Synchronization of motor unit activity during voluntary contraction in man. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  C J De Luca,et al.  Synchronization of motor-unit firings in several human muscles. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  T. Sears,et al.  Short‐term synchronization of intercostal motoneurone activity. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  D. Kernell The Limits of Firing Frequency in Cat Lumbosacral Motoneurones Possessing Different Time Course of Afterhyperpolarization , 1965 .

[10]  Dr. D. Kernell,et al.  Relation between isometric force and stimulus rate in cat's hindlimb motor units of different twitch contraction time , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  B. Calancie,et al.  Limitations of the spike‐triggered averaging technique , 1986, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Motor unit control properties in constant-force isometric contractions. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  O. Lippold,et al.  Motor unit activity in the voluntary contraction of human muscle , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  T. Moritani,et al.  Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction. , 1978, American journal of physical medicine.

[15]  Roger M Enoka,et al.  Multiple features of motor-unit activity influence force fluctuations during isometric contractions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  C. D. De Luca,et al.  Behaviour of human motor units in different muscles during linearly varying contractions , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  H J Freund,et al.  [Dependence of the action potential amplitude of motor units on the recruitment threshold: implications for electromyography]. , 1986, EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete.

[18]  R. Merletti,et al.  Hermite expansions of compact support waveforms: applications to myoelectric signals , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Ping Zhou,et al.  MUAP Number Estimates in Surface EMG: Template-Matching Methods and Their Performance Boundaries , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  B. Bigland-ritchie,et al.  Linear and non-linear surface EMG/force relationships in human muscles. An anatomical/functional argument for the existence of both. , 1983, American journal of physical medicine.

[21]  Gabriella Olmo,et al.  Matched wavelet approach in stretching analysis of electrically evoked surface EMG signal , 2000, Signal Process..

[22]  H. Clamann,et al.  Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press COMPARISON OF THE RECRUITMENT AND DISCHARGE PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN H U M A N BRACHIAL BICEPS AND A D D U C T O R POLLICIS D U R I N G ISOMETRIC CONTRACTIONS , 2018 .

[23]  R S Johansson,et al.  A comparison of human thenar motor-unit properties studied by intraneural motor-axon stimulation and spike-triggered averaging. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  A J Fuglevand,et al.  Estimating the strength of common input to human motoneurons from the cross‐correlogram. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  J. Wikswo,et al.  In vivo magnetic and electric recordings from nerve bundles and single motor units in mammalian skeletal muscle. Correlations with muscle force , 1991, The Journal of general physiology.

[26]  L. J. Goldberg,et al.  Relationship among recruitment order, spike amplitude, and twitch tension of single motor units in human masseter muscle. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  H. Peter Clamann,et al.  A comparison of electromyographic and mechanical fatigue properties in motor units of the cat hindlimb , 1985, Brain Research.

[28]  W Herzog,et al.  A new method for experimental simulation of EMG using multi-channel independent stimulation of small groups of motor units. , 2001, Motor control.

[29]  A. Kimura,et al.  Motor unit firing behavior in slow and fast contractions of the first dorsal interosseous muscle of healthy men. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  Dario Farina,et al.  Noninvasive estimation of motor unit conduction velocity distribution using linear electrode arrays , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  B. Feinstein,et al.  Morphologic studies of motor units in normal human muscles. , 1955, Acta anatomica.

[32]  V. Dietz,et al.  Activity of single motor units from human forearm muscles during voluntary isometric contractions. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  D. Winter,et al.  Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Enoka,et al.  Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  R B Stein,et al.  The orderly recruitment of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  R S Johansson,et al.  Force-frequency relationships of human thenar motor units. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  M Solomonow,et al.  The EMG-force relationships of skeletal muscle; dependence on contraction rate, and motor units control strategy. , 1990, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  J Tanji,et al.  Firing rate of individual motor units in voluntary contraction of abductor digiti minimi muscle in man. , 1973, Experimental neurology.

[39]  R. Stein,et al.  The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  R. Stein,et al.  Comparison of force and EMG measures in normal and reinnervated tibialis anterior muscles of the rat. , 1991, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[41]  W A Nix,et al.  Relationship between electrical and mechanical properties of motor units. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[42]  C J De Luca,et al.  Rank‐ordered regulation of motor units , 1996, Muscle & nerve.

[43]  W Wolf,et al.  Assessment of human motor unit twitches--a comparison of spike-triggered averaging and intramuscular microstimulation. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  R. Enoka,et al.  Motor-unit synchronization alters spike-triggered average force in simulated contractions. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  T. Miles,et al.  Effect of motor unit firing pattern on twitches obtained by spike‐triggered averaging , 1989, Muscle & nerve.

[46]  P. A. Rea,et al.  Recording and identification of single motor units in the free-to-move primate hand , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  K. Y. Lim,et al.  Computational methods for improving estimates of motor unit twitch contraction properties , 1995, Muscle & nerve.