Accuracy in optical overlay metrology

In this paper we discuss the mechanism by which process variations determine the overlay accuracy of optical metrology. We start by focusing on scatterometry, and showing that the underlying physics of this mechanism involves interference effects between cavity modes that travel between the upper and lower gratings in the scatterometry target. A direct result is the behavior of accuracy as a function of wavelength, and the existence of relatively well defined spectral regimes in which the overlay accuracy and process robustness degrades (`resonant regimes’). These resonances are separated by wavelength regions in which the overlay accuracy is better and independent of wavelength (we term these `flat regions’). The combination of flat and resonant regions forms a spectral signature which is unique to each overlay alignment and carries certain universal features with respect to different types of process variations. We term this signature the `landscape’, and discuss its universality. Next, we show how to characterize overlay performance with a finite set of metrics that are available on the fly, and that are derived from the angular behavior of the signal and the way it flags resonances. These metrics are used to guarantee the selection of accurate recipes and targets for the metrology tool, and for process control with the overlay tool. We end with comments on the similarity of imaging overlay to scatterometry overlay, and on the way that pupil overlay scatterometry and field overlay scatterometry differ from an accuracy perspective.

[1]  Reinder Plug,et al.  Improving on-product performance at litho using integrated diffraction-based metrology and computationally designed device-like targets fit for advanced technologies (incl. FinFET) , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Shaunee Cheng,et al.  Diffraction based overlay metrology: accuracy and performance on front end stack , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Daniel Kandel,et al.  Diffraction order control in overlay metrology: a review of the roadmap options , 2008, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Henk-Jan H. Smilde,et al.  Target design optimization for overlay scatterometry to improve on-product overlay , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Guy Cohen,et al.  Overlay accuracy fundamentals , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Jacky Huang,et al.  Accuracy of diffraction-based and image-based overlay , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Anthony Yen,et al.  Overlay similarity: a new overlay index for metrology tool and scanner overlay fingerprint methodology , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Arie den Boef,et al.  Evaluation of a novel ultra small target technology supporting on-product overlay measurements , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Philippe Leray,et al.  Hybrid overlay metrology with CDSEM in a BEOL patterning scheme , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Yen-Liang Chen,et al.  Quality indicators of image-based overlay , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Jan Beltman,et al.  Performance of ASML YieldStar μDBO overlay targets for advanced lithography nodes C028 and C014 overlay process control , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Noelle Wright,et al.  New approaches for scatterometry-based metrology for critical distance and overlay measurement and process control , 2011 .

[13]  Guy Cohen,et al.  Overlay quality metric , 2012, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Noelle Wright,et al.  Evaluation of a new metrology technique to support the needs of accuracy, precision, speed, and sophistication in near-future lithography , 2009, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Arie den Boef,et al.  Advanced litho-cluster control via integrated in-chip metrology , 2013, ASMC 2013 SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference.

[16]  Yen-Liang Chen,et al.  Reduction of image-based ADI-to-AEI overlay inconsistency with improved algorithm , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[17]  Kevin Ryan,et al.  Improving full-wafer on-product overlay using computationally designed process-robust and device-like metrology targets , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Maurits van der Schaar,et al.  A comprehensive look at a new metrology technique to support the needs of lithography performance in near future , 2008, Lithography Asia.

[19]  Vladimir Levinski,et al.  Differential signal scatterometry overlay metrology: an accuracy investigation , 2007, SPIE Optical Metrology.

[20]  Albert Li,et al.  Litho process control via optimum metrology sampling while providing cycle time reduction and faster metrology-to-litho turn around time , 2011, Advanced Lithography.

[21]  Chan Hwang,et al.  A novel robust diffraction-based metrology concept for measurement and monitoring of critical layers in memory devices , 2010, Advanced Lithography.