Transfer functions for simulating the structural vibration modes of large aircraft

Large aircraf3 may possess slow structural modes that can affect handling qualities if excited Little has been done to simulate these structural modes during pilot in the loop analyses. A fast and simple method to simulate the longitudinal structural modes of large aircraft has been developed A shape function for fuselage was obtained from a finite element model. This deflection function was used to develop transfer fimctions for flight simulation. The tram&er functions were developed in a method similar to that used at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Flight simulations are planned to explore the effects of the structural modes on handling qualities of the aircraft in question. / Aeronautical Engineering Master’s Student, Member, + Aeronautical Engineering Master’s Student, Member, $ Assistant Professor, Department of Aeronautical Engineering B Professor, Department of Aeronautical Engineering q Professor, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Associate Fellow, AIAA Copyright

[1]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Hybrid state equations of motion for flexible bodies in terms of quasi-coordinates , 1991 .

[2]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Unified literal approximations for longitudinal dynamics of flexible flight vehicles , 1995 .

[3]  M. Phan,et al.  Integrated system identification and state estimation for control offlexible space structures , 1992 .

[4]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Aeroelastic vehicle multivariable control synthesis with analytical robustness evaluation , 1994 .

[5]  R Waszak Martin,et al.  Modeling and Model Simplification of Aeroelastic Vehicles: An Overview , 1992 .

[6]  J. W. Smith,et al.  Analysis of longitudinal pilot-induced oscillation tendencies of YF-12 aircraft , 1975 .

[7]  W. P. Rodden,et al.  Equations of motion of a quasisteady flight vehicle utilizing restrained static aeroelastic characteristics , 1985 .

[8]  Mary F. Shafer,et al.  Low-Order Equivalent Models of Highly Augmented Aircraft Determined from Flight Data , 1982 .

[9]  K. Lim Method for Optimal Actuator and Sensor Placement for Large Flexible Structures , 1992 .

[10]  I. Lottati Aeroelastic tailoring of a composite wing with a decoupler pylon as a wing/store flutter suppressor , 1988 .

[11]  B. A. Winther,et al.  Aeroelastic effects on the B-2 maneuver response , 1995 .

[12]  M. Karpel,et al.  Efficient vibration mode analysis of aircraft with multiple external store configurations , 1988 .

[13]  R. E. Maine,et al.  Application of parameter estimation to aircraft stability and control: The output-error approach , 1986 .

[14]  T. A. Weisshaar,et al.  Quadratic synthhesis of integrated active controls for an aeroelastic forward-swept-wing aircraft , 1984 .

[15]  H. Baruh,et al.  Actuator placement in structural control , 1992 .

[16]  Daniel Biezad,et al.  Investigation of Dynamic Structural Models Suitable for the Simulation of Large Aircraft , 1999 .

[17]  Trevor Williams,et al.  Closed-form Grammians and model reduction for flexible space structures , 1988 .

[18]  Zhen Yan,et al.  Aircraft dynamic response to variable wing sweep geometry , 1988 .

[19]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Analytical aeropropulsive-aeroelastic hypersonic-vehicle model with dynamic analysis , 1994 .

[20]  Mark R. Anderson,et al.  ROBUSTNESS EVALUATION OF A FLEXIBLE AIRCRAFT CONTROL SYSTEM , 1993 .

[21]  Wodek Gawronski,et al.  Model reduction for flexible space structures , 1991 .

[22]  Bruce G. Powers Structural dynamic model obtained from flight use with piloted simulation and handling qualities analysis , 1996 .

[23]  Jen-Kuang Huang,et al.  Integrated system identification and state estimation for control of flexible space structures , 1992 .

[24]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Numerical and literal aeroelastic-vehicle-model reduction for feedback control synthesis , 1991 .

[25]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Flight dynamics of aeroelastic vehicles , 1988 .

[26]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Integrated structure/control law design by multilevel optimization , 1989 .