Discovery of an Afterglow Extension of the Prompt Phase of Two Gamma Ray Bursts Observed by Swift

Contemporaneous BAT and XRT observations of two recent well-covered GRBs observed by Swift, GRB 050315 and GRB 050319, show clearly a prompt component of the afterglow emission. The rapid slewing capability of the spacecraft enables X-ray observations immediately after the burst, typically approximately 100 s following the initiation of the prompt gamma-ray phase. By fitting a power law form to the gamma-ray spectrum, we extrapolate the time dependent fluxes measured by the BAT, in the energy band 15 - 350 keV, into the spectral regime observed by the XRT, 0.2 - 10 keV, and examine the functional form of the rate of decay of the two light curves. We find that the BAT and XRT light curves merge to form a unified curve. There is a period of steep decay up to approximately 300 s, followed by a flatter decay. The duration of the steep decay, approximately 100 s in the source frame after correcting for cosmological time dilation, agrees with a theoretical estimate for the deceleration time of the relativistic ejecta as it interacts with circumstellar material. For GRB 050315, the steep decay can be characterized by an exponential form, where T(sub e),(BAT)approximately equal to 24 plus or minus 2 s, and T(sub e)(XRT) approximately equal to 35 plus or minus 2 s. For GRB 050319 a power law decay -d lnf/d lnt = n, where n approximately equal to 3, provides a reasonable fit. The early time X-ray fluxes are consistent with representing the lower energy tail of the prompt emission, and provide our first quantitative measure of the decay of the prompt gamma-ray emission over a large dynamic range. The initial steep decay is expected from the high latitude emission from a curved shell of relativistic plasma illuminated only for a short interval. The overall conclusion is that the prompt phase of GRBs lasts for hundreds of seconds longer than previously thought.

[1]  C. Kouveliotou,et al.  Identification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts , 1993 .

[2]  A. Panaitescu,et al.  Afterglow Emission from Naked Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2000, astro-ph/0006317.

[3]  A. MacFadyen,et al.  Collapsars: Gamma-Ray Bursts and Explosions in “Failed Supernovae” , 1998, astro-ph/9810274.

[4]  V. Connaughton,et al.  BATSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Tails , 2001, astro-ph/0111564.

[5]  Charles D. Dermer Curvature Effects in Gamma-Ray Burst Colliding Shells , 2004 .

[6]  M. Rees,et al.  Unsteady outflow models for cosmological gamma-ray bursts , 1994, astro-ph/9404038.

[7]  S. R. Kulkarni,et al.  BEAMING IN GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: EVIDENCE FOR A STANDARD ENERGY RESERVOIR , 2001 .

[8]  M. Feroci,et al.  BeppoSAX Measurements of the Bright Gamma-Ray Burst 010222 , 2001, astro-ph/0104362.

[9]  Bing Zhang,et al.  Gamma-Ray Bursts: Progress, Problems & Prospects , 2004 .

[10]  V. Connaughton,et al.  Evidence for an Early High-Energy Afterglow Observed with BATSE from GRB 980923 , 1999, astro-ph/9908139.

[11]  A. Panaitescu,et al.  Fundamental Physical Parameters of Collimated Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows , 2001 .

[12]  N. Gehrels,et al.  Bright X-ray Flares in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows , 2005, Science.

[13]  M. Rees,et al.  Relativistic fireballs: energy conversion and time-scales , 1992 .

[14]  Arnon Dar,et al.  Towards a complete theory of gamma-ray bursts , 2004 .

[15]  Filippo Frontera,et al.  BeppoSAX confirmation of beamed afterglow emission from GRB 990510 , 2000, astro-ph/0012107.

[16]  P. Giommi,et al.  An unexpectedly rapid decline in the X-ray afterglow emission of long γ-ray bursts , 2005, Nature.