Clinical Investigation : Thoracic Cancer Automated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Planning for Stage III Lung Cancer : How Does It Compare With Intensity-Modulated Radio Therapy ?

PURPOSE To compare the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans generated by an automated inverse planning system with that of dosimetrist-generated IMRT treatment plans for patients with stage III lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two groups of 8 patients with stage III lung cancer were randomly selected. For group 1, the dosimetrists spent their best effort in designing IMRT plans to compete with the automated inverse planning system (mdaccAutoPlan); for group 2, the dosimetrists were not in competition and spent their regular effort. Five experienced radiation oncologists independently blind-reviewed and ranked the three plans for each patient: a rank of 1 was the best and 3 was the worst. Dosimetric measures were also performed to quantitatively evaluate the three types of plans. RESULTS Blind rankings from different oncologists were generally consistent. For group 1, the auto-VMAT, auto-IMRT, and manual IMRT plans received average ranks of 1.6, 2.13, and 2.18, respectively. The auto-VMAT plans in group 1 had 10% higher planning tumor volume (PTV) conformality and 24% lower esophagus V70 (the volume receiving 70 Gy or more) than the manual IMRT plans; they also resulted in more than 20% higher complication-free tumor control probability (P+) than either type of IMRT plans. The auto- and manual IMRT plans in this group yielded generally comparable dosimetric measures. For group 2, the auto-VMAT, auto-IMRT, and manual IMRT plans received average ranks of 1.55, 1.75, and 2.75, respectively. Compared to the manual IMRT plans in this group, the auto-VMAT plans and auto-IMRT plans showed, respectively, 17% and 14% higher PTV dose conformality, 8% and 17% lower mean lung dose, 17% and 26% lower mean heart dose, and 36% and 23% higher P+. CONCLUSIONS mdaccAutoPlan is capable of generating high-quality VMAT and IMRT treatment plans for stage III lung cancer. Manual IMRT plans could achieve quality similar to auto-IMRT plans if best effort was spent.

[1]  Ping Xia,et al.  Can all centers plan intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) effectively? An external audit of dosimetric comparisons between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and IMRT for adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Albert S. Zacarias,et al.  Volumetric modulated Arc therapy (VMAT) treatment planning for superficial tumors. , 2010, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[3]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Ke Sheng,et al.  Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  D. Yan,et al.  Clinical applications of volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Pietro Mancosu,et al.  Volumetric modulation arc radiotherapy compared with static gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma tumor: a feasibility study. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  M. Moerland,et al.  A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: application to the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[10]  Rajat J Kudchadker,et al.  A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Xiaoning Pan,et al.  A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  A Brahme,et al.  An algorithm for maximizing the probability of complication-free tumour control in radiation therapy , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  Volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the anal canal: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  K. Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of prostate radiotherapy: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Richard Shaffer,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy improves dosimetry and reduces treatment time compared to conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer and internal mammary nodes. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.