Brain Activations during Visual Search: Contributions of Search Efficiency versus Feature Binding

We investigated the involvement of the parietal cortex in binding features during visual search using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We tested 10 subjects in four visual search tasks across which we independently manipulated (1) the requirement to integrate different types of features in a stimulus (feature or conjunction search) and (2) the degree of search efficiency (efficient or inefficient). We identified brain areas that were common to all conditions of visual search and areas that were sensitive to the factors of efficiency and feature binding. Visual search engaged an extensive network of parietal, frontal, and occipital areas. The factor of efficiency exerted a strong influence on parietal activations along the intraparietal sulcus and in the superior parietal lobule. These regions showed a main effect of efficiency and showed a simple effect when inefficient conditions were compared directly with efficient pop-out conditions in the absence of feature binding. Furthermore, a correlation analysis supported a tight correspondence between posterior parietal activation and the slope of reaction-time search functions. Conversely, feature binding during efficient pop-out search was not sufficient to modulate the parietal cortex. The results confirm the important role of the parietal cortex in visual search, but suggest that feature binding is not a requirement to engage its contribution.

[1]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Functional (PET) Images: The Assessment of Significant Change , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[5]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Visual Feature and Conjunction Searches of Equal Difficulty Engage Only Partially Overlapping Frontoparietal Networks , 2002, NeuroImage.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visual Search: Regional Segregations within the Frontal Eye Fields and Effective Connectivity of the Superior Colliculus , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Attention Systems and the Organization of the Human Parietal Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[9]  J D Schall,et al.  Dynamic dissociation of visual selection from saccade programming in frontal eye field. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[11]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  H. Nothdurft Focal attention in visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[13]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  The Effects of Interdistracter Similarity on Search Processes in Superior Parietal Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Use of Short Intertrial Intervals in Single-Trial Experiments: A 3T fMRI-Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[15]  C. Frith,et al.  A fronto-parietal network for rapid visual information processing: a PET study of sustained attention and working memory , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  T Shallice,et al.  The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual Feature Integration with an Attention Deficit , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[21]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[23]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review , 2000, Vision Research.

[24]  M. Petrides The role of the mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in working memory , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[26]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[27]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Dissociation of visual discrimination from saccade programming in macaque frontal eye field. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Event‐related fMRI: Comparison of conditions with varying BOLD overlap , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[29]  C. Frith,et al.  Monitoring for target objects: activation of right frontal and parietal cortices with increasing time on task , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  A. Treisman,et al.  The Interaction of Spatial and Object Pathways: Evidence from Balint's Syndrome , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[34]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  L. Chelazzi Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A critical look at the evidence , 1999, Psychological research.

[37]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[38]  R T Knight,et al.  Cortical substrates supporting visual search in humans. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Ewa Wojciulik Nancy Kanwisher Implicit but not Explicit Feature Binding in a Balint's Patient , 1998 .

[40]  A. Villringer,et al.  Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[41]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[43]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[44]  Adrian M. Owen,et al.  The role of the lateral frontal cortex in mnemonic processing: the contribution of functional neuroimaging , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  R A Andersen,et al.  Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[46]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Space and attention in parietal cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[47]  C. D. Frith,et al.  Filtering of Distractors during Visual Search Studied by Positron Emission Tomography , 2002, NeuroImage.

[48]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[49]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  R. Passingham,et al.  The left parietal cortex and motor attention , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[52]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[53]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Visual hemispatial inattention: stimulus parameters and exploratory strategies. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[54]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Influence of Stimulus Salience and Attentional Demands on Visual Search Patterns in Hemispatial Neglect , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[55]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[56]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[58]  C. Colby,et al.  Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[59]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[60]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Functional Specificity of Superior Parietal Mediation of Spatial Shifting , 2001, NeuroImage.

[61]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[62]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[63]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[64]  S. Zeki,et al.  The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[65]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Covert Visual Spatial Orienting and Saccades: Overlapping Neural Systems , 2000, NeuroImage.

[66]  G. Orban,et al.  Attention Mechanisms in Visual SearchAn fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  J. Duncan Boundary Conditions on Parallel Processing in Human Vision , 1989, Perception.