The Patient Health Questionnaire, Japanese Version: Validity According to the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview–Plus

To validate the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire against the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus in Japan 131 patients in 4 primary care settings and 2 general hospital settings participated. These patients completed the Patient Health Questionnaire and returned it to their physician within 48 hr. Subsequently, the subjects underwent a diagnostic evaluation interview based on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus by an interviewer blind to the results of the Patient Health Questionnaire screening. The Patient Health Questionnaire diagnosis was characterized using kappa values between 0.70 and 1.0 for Somatoform Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Panic Disorder, Bulimia Nervosa, Alcohol Abuse/Dependence, and Premenstrual Disorder. Sensitivities, specificities, and negative predictive values were very good (between 0.84 and 1.0) for the first 4 diagnoses but not Alcohol Abuse/Dependence or Premenstrual Disorder, as were the Positive predictive values (between 0.78 and 1.0). Findings show very good concordance of the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire with the Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview–Plus.

[1]  D. Blazer,et al.  The NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area program. Historical context, major objectives, and study population characteristics. , 1984, Archives of general psychiatry.

[2]  P. May,et al.  PRIME-MD: Its Utility in Detecting Mental Disorders in American Indians , 1997, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[3]  O. O. Afolabi,et al.  Validity of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a screening tool for depression amongst Nigerian university students. , 2006, Journal of affective disorders.

[4]  R. Kessler,et al.  Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. , 1994, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  D. Sheehan,et al.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. , 1998, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[6]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-15: Validity of a New Measure for Evaluating the Severity of Somatic Symptoms , 2002, Psychosomatic medicine.

[7]  K Kroenke,et al.  Validation and Utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire in Diagnosing Mental Disorders in 1003 General Hospital Spanish Inpatients , 2001, Psychosomatic medicine.

[8]  G. Dunbar,et al.  The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI , 1997, European Psychiatry.

[9]  R. Spitzer,et al.  Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  L. Robins THE COMPOSITE INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW (CIDI) , 1994 .

[11]  S. Becker,et al.  Screening for Somatization and Depression in Saudi Arabia: A Validation Study of the Phq in Primary Care , 2002, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[12]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9 , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[14]  Stephan Zipfel,et al.  Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses. , 2004, Journal of affective disorders.

[15]  G. Dunbar,et al.  The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability , 1997, European Psychiatry.

[16]  Masaru Mimura,et al.  Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini‐International Neuropsychiatric Interview , 2005, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[17]  K Kroenke,et al.  Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. , 1994, JAMA.

[18]  A. Gil,et al.  [Validation of the Spanish version of PRIME-MD: a procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care]. , 1999, Actas espanolas de psiquiatria.

[19]  A. Szegedi,et al.  The primary care evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME-MD), German version: a comparison with the CIDI. , 2000, Journal of psychiatric research.

[20]  R. Spitzer,et al.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. , 1999, JAMA.