Energy Recovery from the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: A Real Options-Based Facility Assessment

During the last years, due to the strict regulations on waste landfilling, anaerobic digestion (AD) of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) is increasingly considered a sustainable alternative for waste stabilization and energy recovery. AD can reduce the volume of OFMSW going to landfill and produce, at the same time, biogas and compost, all at a profit. The uncertainty about the collected quantity of organic fraction, however, may undermine the economic-financial sustainability of such plants. While the flexibility characterizing some AD technologies may prove very valuable in uncertain contexts since it allows adapting plant capacity to changing environments, the investment required for building flexible systems is generally higher than the investment for dedicated equipment. Hence, an adequate justification of investments in these flexible systems is needed. This paper presents the results of a study aimed at investigating how different technologies may perform from technical, economic and financial standpoints, in presence of an uncertain organic fraction quantity to be treated. Focusing on two AD treatment plant configurations characterized by a technological process with different degree of flexibility, a real options-based model is developed and then applied to the case of the urban waste management system of the Metropolitan Area of Bari (Italy). Results show the importance of pricing the flexibility of treatment plants, which becomes a critical factor in presence of an uncertain organic fraction. Hence, it has to be taken into consideration in the design phase of these plants.

[1]  Tao Wang,et al.  Real Options by Spreadsheet: Parking Garage Case Example , 2006 .

[2]  Fred O Agyeman,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and dairy manure: effects of food waste particle size and organic loading rate. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Nunzia Carbonara,et al.  Public-private partnerships for energy efficiency projects: A win-win model to choose the energy performance contracting structure , 2018 .

[4]  L. Ranieri,et al.  The sustainability of anaerobic digestion plants: a win–win strategy for public and private bodies , 2015 .

[5]  A. Tremier,et al.  Characterizing the variability of food waste quality: A need for efficient valorisation through anaerobic digestion. , 2016, Waste management.

[6]  Yuan Zhenhong,et al.  Semi-dry mesophilic anaerobic digestion of water sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste (WS-OFMSW). , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[7]  H. Poggi‐Varaldo,et al.  High-Solids Anaerobic Digestion of Mixed Municipal and Industrial Waste , 1997 .

[8]  Jutarat Suwannarat,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of food waste using yeast. , 2015, Waste management.

[9]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  An options view of investments in expansion-flexible manufacturing systems , 1995 .

[10]  A. Dixit,et al.  Chapter 19 – The Options Approach to Capital Investment , 1998 .

[11]  M. Pérez,et al.  Kinetics of mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Influence of initial total solid concentration. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste , 2013 .

[13]  P. Boyle Options: A Monte Carlo approach , 1977 .

[14]  S. Ross,et al.  Option pricing: A simplified approach☆ , 1979 .

[15]  Robert L. Williams,et al.  Current Anaerobic Digestion Technologies Used for Treatment of Municipal Organic Solid Waste , 2014 .

[16]  S. Kusch Understanding and Managing the Start-up Phase in Dry Anaerobic Digestion , 2014 .

[17]  Diego Sales,et al.  Determination of critical and optimum conditions for biomethanization of OFMSW in a semi-continuous stirred tank reactor , 2011 .

[18]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste , 2004 .

[19]  Heribert Insam,et al.  Biotic and abiotic dynamics of a high solid-state anaerobic digestion box-type container system. , 2016, Waste management.

[20]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Valuation of expansion flexibility in flexible manufacturing system investments using sequential exchange options , 2005, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[21]  P. Weiland Biogas production: current state and perspectives , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[22]  Diane M. Lander,et al.  Challenges to the practical implementation of modeling and valuing real options , 1998 .

[23]  Nickolas J. Themelis,et al.  Methane generation in landfills , 2007 .

[24]  Joan Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives , 2000 .

[25]  L De Baere,et al.  Will anaerobic digestion of solid waste survive in the future? , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  Giorgio Mossa,et al.  New Models for Sustainable Logistics , 2016 .

[27]  Jhih-Shyang Shih,et al.  Assessing the Role of Renewable Energy Policies in Landfill Gas to Energy Projects , 2014 .

[28]  Alastair J Ward,et al.  Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[29]  Mariagrazia Dotoli,et al.  Measuring and Managing the Smartness of Cities: A Framework for Classifying Performance Indicators , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[30]  Muhammad Arshad,et al.  The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. , 2011, Waste management.

[31]  Maria Grazia Gnoni,et al.  A mixed integer linear programming model for optimisation of organics management in an integrated solid waste system , 2008 .

[32]  Daniel Hoornweg,et al.  What a waste? : a global review of solid waste management , 2012 .

[33]  Mariagrazia Dotoli,et al.  Using multi-objective optimization for the integrated energy efficiency improvement of a smart city public buildings' portfolio , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[34]  F. Black,et al.  The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  M. Kranert,et al.  Dry Digestion of Organic Residues , 2011 .

[36]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  What type of digester configurations should be employed to produce biomethane from grass silage , 2010 .

[37]  M. Fdz-Polanco,et al.  Theoretical methane production generated by the co-digestion of organic fraction municipal solid waste and biological sludge , 2014, Biotechnology reports.

[38]  P. Kaparaju,et al.  Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic fraction of household municipal solid waste: start-up procedure for continuously stirred tank reactor. , 2006, Water research.