The Design and Implementation of Semantic Web-Based Architecture for Augmented Reality Browser

Due to the proliferation of smartphones, Augmented Reality applications have become more widespread nowadays. Augmented Reality browsers have especially enjoyed wide popularity within these applications. The physical environment could be extended by location-aware additional information using these browsers. At present, typically a specific data source is used by the current Augmented Reality browsers, even if there is an enormous amount of available data sources. The Semantic Web could help to bridge this problem. The goal of this work is to combine Augmented Reality and Semantic Web technologies in order to enhance the existing mobile Augmented Reality browsers using Semantic Web technologies. For this purpose, we utilize the advantages of the Semantic Web technologies such as data integration, unified data model as well as publicly available semantic data sources, among other things.

[1]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  LinkedGeoData: Adding a Spatial Dimension to the Web of Data , 2009, SEMWEB.

[2]  Willem Robert van Hage,et al.  Mobile Cultural Heritage Guide: Location-Aware Semantic Search , 2010, EKAW.

[3]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data , 2009, J. Web Semant..

[4]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Evaluating Augmented Reality Systems , 2011, Handbook of Augmented Reality.

[5]  András Micsik,et al.  Exploring publication metadata graphs with the LODmilla browser and editor , 2014, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[6]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  A METHOD FOR ONTOLOGY CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND INTEGRATION ON RELATION LEVEL , 2007, Cybern. Syst..

[7]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[8]  Stefan Zander,et al.  A computational model for the integration of linked data in mobile augmented reality applications , 2012, I-SEMANTICS '12.

[9]  Raimondo Schettini,et al.  How to assess image quality within a workflow chain: an overview , 2014, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[10]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Complexity Analysis of Ontology Integration Methodologies: A Comparative Study , 2009, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[11]  E. Prud hommeaux,et al.  SPARQL query language for RDF , 2011 .

[12]  Attila Kiss,et al.  A Semantically Enriched Augmented Reality Browser , 2014, HCI.

[13]  H. Lan,et al.  SWRL : A semantic Web rule language combining OWL and ruleML , 2004 .

[14]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[15]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Swoosh: a generic approach to entity resolution , 2008, The VLDB Journal.

[16]  Attila Kiss,et al.  Experimental evaluation of some geodata management systems , 2014, 2014 9th International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems (ICCES).

[17]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  Schema and ontology matching with COMA++ , 2005, SIGMOD '05.

[18]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[19]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Collaborative creation of semantic points of interest as linked data on the mobile phone , 2010 .

[20]  Attila Kiss,et al.  Geodint: Towards Semantic Web-Based Geographic Data Integration , 2014, ACIIDS.

[21]  Gergo Gombos,et al.  mSWB: Towards a Mobile Semantic Web Browser , 2014, MobiWIS.

[22]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches , 2004, SGMD.

[23]  Csaba István Sidló.  Generic Entity Resolution in Relational Databases , 2009, ADBIS.