Deep sub-wavelength metrology for advanced defect classification

Particle defects are important contributors to yield loss in semi-conductor manufacturing. Particles need to be detected and characterized in order to determine and eliminate their root cause. We have conceived a process flow for advanced defect classification (ADC) that distinguishes three consecutive steps; detection, review and classification. For defect detection, TNO has developed the Rapid Nano (RN3) particle scanner, which illuminates the sample from nine azimuth angles. The RN3 is capable of detecting 42 nm Latex Sphere Equivalent (LSE) particles on XXX-flat Silicon wafers. For each sample, the lower detection limit (LDL) can be verified by an analysis of the speckle signal, which originates from the surface roughness of the substrate. In detection-mode (RN3.1), the signal from all illumination angles is added. In review-mode (RN3.9), the signals from all nine arms are recorded individually and analyzed in order to retrieve additional information on the shape and size of deep sub-wavelength defects. This paper presents experimental and modelling results on the extraction of shape information from the RN3.9 multi-azimuth signal such as aspect ratio, skewness, and orientation of test defects. Both modeling and experimental work confirm that the RN3.9 signal contains detailed defect shape information. After review by RN3.9, defects are coarsely classified, yielding a purified Defect-of-Interest (DoI) list for further analysis on slower metrology tools, such as SEM, AFM or HIM, that provide more detailed review data and further classification. Purifying the DoI list via optical metrology with RN3.9 will make inspection time on slower review tools more efficient.

[1]  H Sadeghian,et al.  Sub-50 nm metrology on extreme ultra violet chemically amplified resist--A systematic assessment. , 2015, The Review of scientific instruments.

[2]  Dave Balachandran,et al.  Comparative defect classifications and analysis of Lasertec's M1350 and M7360 , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  W. Steen Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles , 1999 .

[4]  J. Vlieger,et al.  Light scattering by a sphere on a substrate , 1986 .

[5]  Dan Rost,et al.  Automatic classification of blank substrate defects , 2014, Photomask Technology.

[6]  Emile van Veldhoven,et al.  Imaging and nanofabrication with the helium ion microscope of the Van Leeuwenhoek Laboratory in Delft. , 2012, Scanning.

[7]  Erik Fritz,et al.  RapidNano: Towards 20nm Particle Detection on EUV Mask Blanks , 2016 .

[8]  Sandro Hannemann,et al.  Implementation of background scattering variance reduction on the rapid nano particle scanner , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Philippe Lalanne,et al.  Near-to-Far Field Transformations for Radiative and Guided Waves , 2016 .

[10]  Cornelis W. Hagen,et al.  Determination of line edge roughness in low-dose top-down scanning electron microscopy images , 2014 .

[11]  Hajime Igarashi,et al.  Classification and size estimation of wafer defects by using scattered light distribution , 2015 .

[12]  Paul F. A. Alkemade,et al.  Enhancing re-detection efficacy of defects on blank wafers using stealth fiducial markers , 2016 .

[13]  Mohammad Ali Mohammad,et al.  Fundamentals of Electron Beam Exposure and Development , 2012 .