An empirical analysis of trends in psychology.

The present research examined trends in the prominence of 4 widely recognized schools in scientific psychology: psychoanalysis, behaviorism, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience. The results, which replicated across 3 measures of prominence, showed the following trends: (a) psychoanalytic research has been virtually ignored by mainstream scientific psychology over the past several decades; (b) behavioral psychology has declined in prominence and gave way to the ascension of cognitive psychology during the 1970s; (c) cognitive psychology has sustained a steady upward trajectory and continues to be the most prominent school; and (d) neuroscience has seen only a modest increase in prominence in mainstream psychology, despite evidence for its conspicuous growth in general. The authors use these findings as a springboard for discussing different views of scientific prominence and conclude that psychologists should evaluate trends in the field empirically, not intuitively.

[1]  Duane Schultz,et al.  A History of Modern Psychology , 1969 .

[2]  B. Baars.  The Cognitive Revolution in Psychology , 1986 .

[3]  T. Broadbent,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , 1972 .

[4]  T. Leahey.  A History of Modern Psychology , 1991 .

[5]  P. Churchland.  Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind , 1989 .

[6]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[7]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[8]  M. Hunt,et al.  心理学的故事 = The story of psychology , 1993 .

[9]  K. Craik,et al.  Is There a Citation Bias in the Judgment and Decision Literature , 1993 .

[10]  M. Masterman.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: The Nature of a Paradigm , 1970 .

[11]  L. Briskman.  Is a Kuhnian Analysis Applicable To Psychology? , 1972 .

[12]  N. Warren.  Is a Scientific Revolution Taking Place in Psychology?—Doubts and Reservations , 1971 .

[13]  H. Kendler.  Historical foundations of modern psychology , 1986 .

[14]  W. Pierce.  Behavior Analysis Is Alive and Well. , 1996 .

[15]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[16]  R. Larzelere,et al.  Changes in modern psychology: A citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. , 1993 .

[17]  D. Westen.  The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: Toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. , 1998 .

[18]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[19]  H. Gardner.  The mind's new science: a history of the cognitive revolution , 1985 .

[20]  L. Beach,et al.  The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. , 1984 .

[21]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[22]  B. Gholson,et al.  Kuhn, Lakatos, and Laudan: Applications in the history of physics and psychology. , 1985 .

[23]  R. Sperry.  Psychology's mentalist paradigm and the religion/science tension. , 1988 .